255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6220908)
1. A comparison between the diagnostic efficacy of 99mTc-MDP, 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-HDP for the detection of bone metastases.
Pauwels EK; Blom J; Camps JA; Hermans J; Rijke AM
Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 6220908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which diphosphonate for routine bone scintigraphy (MDP, HDP or DPD)?
Frühling J; Verbist A; Balikdjian D
Nucl Med Commun; 1986 Jun; 7(6):415-25. PubMed ID: 3748485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical comparison of 99mTc-DPD and two 99mTc-MDP agents.
Vorne M; Vähätalo S; Lantto T
Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(9):395-7. PubMed ID: 6226527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of bone imaging with Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication.
Buell U; Kleinhans E; Zorn-Bopp E; Reuschel W; Muenzing W; Moser EA; Seiderer M
J Nucl Med; 1982 Mar; 23(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 6460854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 99Tcm-MDP and 99Tcm-DPD in pathologic bone lesions. A visual and quantitative comparison.
Lantto T; Vorne M; Mokka R; Vähätalo S
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):631-3. PubMed ID: 2960361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of bone scintigraphy with 99Tcm-DPD, 99Tcm-HDP and 99Tcm-MDP.
Bergqvist L; Brismar J; Cederquist E; Darte L; Naversten Y; Palmer J
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 6236672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biokinetics of bone tracers by means of deconvolution analysis--comparison of 99mTc MDP, 99mTc DPD and 99mTc EHDP.
Knop J; Stritzke P; Kröger E; Schneider C; Wasmus G
Nuklearmedizin; 1982 Aug; 21(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 6216459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a technetium-99m bone imaging agent based on the vicinal diphosphonate 1,2-diphosphonoethyleneglycol (DPEG).
Pauwels EK; Camps JA; Blom J; Hermans J; Kelly JD; Cumming SA; Blackburn GM; Rashid A
Nucl Med Commun; 1985 Nov; 6(11):739-45. PubMed ID: 3831848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technetium-99m MDP vs technetium-99m dicarboxypropane diphosphonate. A clinical comparison in various pathologic conditions.
Godart G; Durez M; Bevilacqua M; Abramovici J; Robience Y
Clin Nucl Med; 1986 Feb; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 3769350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of lesion to normal bone uptake ratios of skeletal radiopharmaceuticals by QARG (quantitative autoradiography).
Ghiron J; Volkert WA; Garlich J; Holmes RA
Int J Rad Appl Instrum B; 1991; 18(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 2026500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone lesion detection with carrier-added 99mTc-EDTMP in comparison with 99mTc-DPD.
Fueger BJ; Mitterhauser M; Wadsak W; Ofluoglu S; Traub T; Karanikas G; Dudczak R; Pirich C
Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Apr; 25(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 15097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The visualization of femoral vessels in delayed bone scans--a sign of arteriosclerosis? A comparison of 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-DPD.
Lantto T; Järvi K; Toivio I; Vähätalo S; Vorne M
Eur J Nucl Med; 1989; 15(5):265-8. PubMed ID: 2759127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effect of 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-MDP on experimentally-induced osteoarthritis in the stifle joint of the dog.
Lee JY; Lee WG; Kim JH; Kang SS; Bae CS; Koong SS; Choi SH
In Vivo; 2005; 19(4):781-5. PubMed ID: 15999549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New diphosphonate compounds for skeletal imaging: comparison with methylene diphosphonate.
Subramanian G; McAfee JG; Thomas FD; Feld TA; Zapf-Longo C; Palladino E
Radiology; 1983 Dec; 149(3):823-8. PubMed ID: 6316414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer analysis of Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP kinetics in humans: concise communication.
Mele M; Conte E; Fratello A; Pasculli D; Pieralice M; D'Addabbo A
J Nucl Med; 1983 Apr; 24(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 6834136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of tc-99m MDP, HMDP, and DPD with respect to bone-to-soft tissue ratios.
Buell U; Kirsch CM; Kleinhans E; Jäger B
J Nucl Med; 1983 Dec; 24(12):1201-2. PubMed ID: 6227711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical comparison of MDP and DMAD.
Rosenthall L; Stern J; Arzoumanian A
Clin Nucl Med; 1982 Sep; 7(9):403-6. PubMed ID: 6214358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative lesion detection ability of Tc-99m HMDP and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication.
Van Duzee BF; Schaefer JA; Ball JD; Chilton HM; Cowan RJ; Kuni C; Trow R; Watson NE
J Nucl Med; 1984 Feb; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 6233404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Four cases of diffuse bone metastasis with increased uptake in 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy].
Dannoura R; Morita S; Kikuchi S; Ohta M; Ohtake H
Kaku Igaku; 1984 Nov; 21(11):1521-5. PubMed ID: 6241644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of metastatic bone disease with pentavalent 99Tc(m)-dimercaptosuccinic acid: a comparison with whole-body scanning and 4/24 hour quantitation of vertebral lesions.
Sahin M; Basoglu T; Bernay I; Yapici O; Canbaz F; Yalin T
Nucl Med Commun; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 10823327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
