These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6221064)

  • 1. Can response preparation begin before stimulus recognition finishes?
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Apr; 9(2):161-82. PubMed ID: 6221064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of preliminary information in a Go versus No-go task.
    Miller J; Schäffer R; Hackley SA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1991 Jun; 76(3):241-92. PubMed ID: 1927576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous decay of response-code activation.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 8090861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the temporal relations between memory scanning and response preparation.
    Ilan AB; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1501-20. PubMed ID: 9778834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of preliminary response preparation from a divided attention task.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):425-34. PubMed ID: 2958591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Apr; 8(2):273-96. PubMed ID: 6461722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can mental rotation begin before perception finishes?
    Ruthruff E; Miller J
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):408-24. PubMed ID: 7666755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priming processes in the Simon task: more evidence from the lexical decision task for a third route in the Simon effect.
    Metzker M; Dreisbach G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):892-902. PubMed ID: 21500940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abnormal externally guided movement preparation in recent-onset schizophrenia is associated with impaired selective attention to external input.
    Smid HG; Westenbroek JM; Bruggeman R; Knegtering H; Van den Bosch RJ
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Nov; 170(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 19762086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-dependent effects of discrete spatial cues on the planning of directed movements.
    Pellizzer G; Hedges JH; Villanueva RR
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 172(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 16432698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal compatibility effects with visual-spatial and auditory-verbal stimulus and response sets.
    Proctor RW; Dutta A; Kelly PL; Weeks DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jan; 55(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8036092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The usefulness of partial information: effects of go probability in the choice/Nogo task.
    Low KA; Miller J
    Psychophysiology; 1999 May; 36(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 10352552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of partial stimulus information in response processing.
    de Jong R; Wierda M; Mulder G; Mulder LJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):682-92. PubMed ID: 2974876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of task type and task requirements on the dissociation of skin conductance responses and secondary task probe reaction time.
    Siddle DA; Lipp OV; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Jan; 33(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 8570797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus-response compatibility and response preparation: effects on motor component of information processing for upper and lower limb responses.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 16491672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets.
    Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-course analysis of temporal preparation on central processes.
    Leonhard T; Bratzke D; Schröter H; Ulrich R
    Psychol Res; 2012 Mar; 76(2):236-51. PubMed ID: 21785868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prestimulus oscillations in the alpha band of the EEG are modulated by the difficulty of feature discrimination and predict activation of a sensory discrimination process.
    Roberts DM; Fedota JR; Buzzell GA; Parasuraman R; McDonald CG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 26(8):1615-28. PubMed ID: 24405187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The asynchronous discrete coding model: further tests with single-attribute stimuli.
    Trevena JA; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Nov; 60(8):1344-56. PubMed ID: 9865076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of stimulus discriminability on strategies for learning multiple temporal discriminations.
    Guilhardi P; Menez M; Caetano MS; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):476-83. PubMed ID: 20067826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.