BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6221242)

  • 1. Moxalactam versus gentamicin-clindamycin in surgical sepsis. Efficacy and safety.
    Stone HH; Kolb L; Geheber CE
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1983 Mar; 72(11):351-5. PubMed ID: 6221242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective randomized comparison of a single antibiotic (moxalactam) versus combination therapy (gentamicin and clindamycin) in penetrating abdominal trauma.
    Fifer T; Obeid FN; Horst HM; Sorensen VJ; Crots LD; Bivins BA
    Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1988; 36(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 3397299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Third-generation cephalosporins for polymicrobial surgical sepsis.
    Stone HH; Strom PR; Fabian TC; Dunlop WE
    Arch Surg; 1983 Feb; 118(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 6295339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ceftriaxone versus combined gentamicin and clindamycin for polymicrobial surgical sepsis.
    Stone HH; Mullins RJ; Strom PR; Bourneuf AA; Geheber CE
    Am J Surg; 1984 Oct; 148(4A):30-4. PubMed ID: 6091478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cefoxitin versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of postcesarean section infections.
    Herman G; Cohen AW; Talbot GH; Coghlan R; Faidley-Mangen P; MacGregor RR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 67(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 3511419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of moxalactam with the combination of clindamycin and an aminoglycoside in the treatment of common surgical infections.
    Rambo WM; Del Bene VE; Burkey LG; Collins CD; Richmond DK
    Rev Infect Dis; 1982; 4 Suppl():S683-7. PubMed ID: 6218583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A double-blind, randomized comparison of moxalactam versus clindamycin-gentamicin in treatment of endomyometritis after cesarean section delivery.
    Gibbs RS; Blanco JD; Duff P; Castaneda YS; St Clair PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 146(7):769-72. PubMed ID: 6223528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical experience with moxalactam in the treatment of mixed aerobic-anaerobic surgical infections].
    Gonzenbach HR; Sonnabend W
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1983 Mar; 72(11):356-62. PubMed ID: 6221243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Twice-daily moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.
    Crots LD; Obeid FN; Horst HM; Bivins BA
    Clin Pharm; 1985; 4(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 3891203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Septicemia and focal infection. Efficacy of moxalactam. Results of the cooperative study conducted in France].
    Carbon C
    Sem Hop; 1983 Jun; 59(26):1981-4. PubMed ID: 6310791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Moxalactam in complications of abdominal surgery].
    Dupeyron JP; Peter JD; Rigolot JC
    Sem Hop; 1983 Jun; 59(26):1985-9. PubMed ID: 6310792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective randomized study of moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in penetrating abdominal trauma.
    Kreis DJ; Augenstein D; Martinez O; Echenique M; Plasencia G; Vopal JJ; Byers P; Gomez GA
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Jul; 163(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 3726718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moxalactam therapy for bacterial infections.
    Winston DJ; Busuttil RW; Kurtz TO; Young LS
    Arch Intern Med; 1981 Nov; 141(12):1607-12. PubMed ID: 6458253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical evaluation of moxalactam].
    Acar JF
    Sem Hop; 1983 Jun; 59(26):1990-3. PubMed ID: 6310793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Moxalactam in pediatrics. Clinical and pharmacokinetic experience. Apropos of 37 cases].
    Bégué P; Safran C; Fleurette J; Brun Y; Floret D; Monnet P
    Sem Hop; 1983 Jun; 59(26):1972-6. PubMed ID: 6310789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of cefamandole versus gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of documented or suspected bacterial peritonitis.
    Busuttil RW; McGrattan MA; Freischlag J
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Jan; 158(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 6362043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective, randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of netilmicin-clindamycin and tobramycin-clindamycin in the treatment of serious systemic infections.
    Kahalley S; Chandler J; Hawkins J; Norris G; Waugespack R; Snow RM
    Clin Ther; 1985; 7(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 4016829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized clinical trial of moxalactam alone versus tobramycin plus clindamycin in abdominal sepsis.
    Schentag JJ; Wels PB; Reitberg DP; Walczak P; Van Tyle JH; Lascola RJ
    Ann Surg; 1983 Jul; 198(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 6222710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
    Strom PR; Geheber CE; Morris ES; Stone HH
    Clin Ther; 1982; 5 Suppl A():26-31. PubMed ID: 6293715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized controlled trial of moxalactam versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of mixed anaerobic/aerobic infections.
    Joshi M; Fitzpatrick BJ; Warren JW; Caplan ES; Tenney JH
    Am Surg; 1986 Sep; 52(9):467-71. PubMed ID: 3530075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.