These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6223553)

  • 1. Limits on alternative auditory representations of speech.
    Studdert-Kennedy M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():33-8. PubMed ID: 6223553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrahemispheric differentiation of vowels: principal component analysis of auditory evoked responses to computer-synthesized vowel sounds.
    Molfese DL; Erwin RJ
    Brain Lang; 1981 Jul; 13(2):333-44. PubMed ID: 6455183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of speech rate and pitch contour on the perception of synthetic speech.
    Slowiaczek LM; Nusbaum HC
    Hum Factors; 1985 Dec; 27(6):701-12. PubMed ID: 2939018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual prosody--introduction to the special issue.
    Krahmer E; Swerts M
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):129-33. PubMed ID: 19624027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Characteristics of the auditory spectral diffraction essential for distinguishing soft vowels from fricative consonants in perception].
    Zhukov SIa
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 3692050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fragile nature of the speech-perception deficit in dyslexia: natural vs synthetic speech.
    Blomert L; Mitterer H
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 15010233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The conceptual similarity of intonational tones and its effects on intertranscriber reliability.
    Herman R; McGory JT
    Lang Speech; 2002 Mar; 45(Pt 1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12375817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical considerations in testing speech perception through electroauditory stimulation.
    Pickett JM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():424-34. PubMed ID: 6223555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synthesized speech rate and pitch effects on intelligibility of warning messages for pilots.
    Simpson CA; Marchionda-Frost K
    Hum Factors; 1984 Oct; 26(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 6241175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decelerated synthesized speech as a means of shaping speed of auditory processing of children with delayed language.
    Alexander DW; Frost BP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Dec; 55(3 Pt 1):783-92. PubMed ID: 6219342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception.
    Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2063-73. PubMed ID: 10530029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustics in human communications: room acoustics, music, and speech.
    Schroeder MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jul; 68(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 6446573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Horizontal directivity patterns differ between vowels extracted from running speech.
    Kocon P; Monson BB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):EL7. PubMed ID: 30075666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of computer-synthesized speech.
    Oshrin SE; Siders JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Oct; 59(2):619-22. PubMed ID: 6240020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of rhythmic grouping: testing the iambic/trochaic law.
    Hay JS; Diehl RL
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 17515221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.
    Benson RR; Richardson M; Whalen DH; Lai S
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):342-53. PubMed ID: 16530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of an auditory model to speech recognition.
    Cohen JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2623-9. PubMed ID: 2526170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual-auditory and orthographic performance of fricative consonants in writing acquisition.
    Schier AC; Berti LC; Chacon L
    Codas; 2013; 25(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 24408170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a tactile vocoder for work recognition.
    Brooks PL; Frost BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6224830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A specialization for speech perception.
    Liberman AM; Mattingly IG
    Science; 1989 Jan; 243(4890):489-94. PubMed ID: 2643163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.