These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6224632)
1. In the matter of the treatment and care of Infant Doe. Declaratory judgment. Circuit Court for the County of Monroe, State of Indiana. Conn Med; 1983 Jul; 47(7):409-10. PubMed ID: 6224632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The legacy of Infant Doe. Cosby MG Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The demise of 'Infant Doe': permitted death gives new life to an old debate. Barbash F; Russell C Washington Post; 1982 Apr; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case. Baumgardner KL Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 'The killing will not stop. Will GF Washington Post; 1982 Apr; ():A29. PubMed ID: 11646266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The death of Infant Doe. Verhey A Reform J; 1982 Jun; 32(6):10-5. PubMed ID: 11651829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When the neonate is defective. Contemp Ob Gyn; 1976 Jun; 7(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11663000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Baby Doe' proposed reg suffers setback in court. Med World News; 1983 Dec; 24(23):27. PubMed ID: 11645566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe. Minow M Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical treatment of defective newborns: an answer to the "Baby Doe" dilemma. Shapiro RS Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 11651781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails. Curran M Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Life at any price? On the American debate over "Baby Doe"]. Miketta G Fortschr Med; 1984 Feb; 102(7):86-7. PubMed ID: 6231236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Euthanasia, medical treatment and the mongoloid child: death as a treatment of choice? Horan DJ Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 11660889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Termination of life support in vegetative states: New York court sets guidelines for private decisions. Beresford HR Ann Neurol; 1982 Jan; 11(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 7059124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Withholding treatment from the retarded: Canadian Psychiatric Association studies legal, medical aspects. Can Med Assoc J; 1979 Mar; 120(6):716, 718. PubMed ID: 11643499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]