These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6224893)

  • 1. Semantic congruity and expectancy in symbolic judgments.
    Banks WP; White H; Sturgill W; Mermelstein R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):560-82. PubMed ID: 6224893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments.
    Shaki S; Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 16686118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: evidence against an expectancy hypothesis.
    Holyoak KJ; Mah WA
    Mem Cognit; 1981 Mar; 9(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 7242334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Congruity and the perceptual comparison task.
    Marschark M; Paivio A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Apr; 7(2):290-308. PubMed ID: 6453924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.
    Shaki S; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11958352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic congruity effects in perceptual comparisons.
    Petrusic WM; Baranski JV
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 May; 45(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 2726407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humans.
    Cantlon JF; Brannon EM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Nov; 102(45):16507-11. PubMed ID: 16260752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process.
    Petrusic WM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):962-86. PubMed ID: 1431758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remembered instructions with symbolic and perceptual comparisons.
    Petrusic WM; Shaki S; Leth-Steensen C
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 18372741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition Priming Magnitude Depends on Affirmative Prime Responses: A Test of Two Congruity Explanations.
    Fiet P; Sorensen L; Mayne Z; Corgiat D; Woltz D
    Am J Psychol; 2016 Winter; 129(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 29558048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of expectancy in comparative judgments.
    Shoben EJ; Sailor KM; Wang MY
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 2913453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation of time course of category and semantic priming.
    Ray S
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Apr; 135(2):133-48. PubMed ID: 18507314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantic priming in the prime task effect: evidence of automatic semantic processing of distractors.
    Marí-Beffa P; Fuentes LJ; Catena A; Houghton G
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 10946546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: an expectancy hypothesis.
    Marschark M; Paivio A
    Mem Cognit; 1979 May; 7(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 91082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-notational semantic priming between symbolic and nonsymbolic numerosity.
    Herrera A; Macizo P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1538-52. PubMed ID: 18777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is an ant larger than a lion?
    Rubinsten O; Henik A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Jul; 111(1):141-54. PubMed ID: 12102118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The masked semantic priming effect is task dependent: Reconsidering the automatic spreading activation process.
    de Wit B; Kinoshita S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1062-75. PubMed ID: 25485751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: salience, expectancy, and associative priming.
    Marschark M
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Mar; 11(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 6191177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming.
    Kiefer M; Martens U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Aug; 139(3):464-89. PubMed ID: 20677895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Markers of automaticity in sleep-associated consolidation of novel words.
    Tham EK; Lindsay S; Gaskell MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():146-57. PubMed ID: 25817848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.