122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6225827)
1. Further analysis of the Crist data on matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
Pike R; Jackson K
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Sep; 112(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 6225827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Context is important but it does not explain everything: a comment on "Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set" by Crist.
Nickerson RS
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 6457078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Putting properties of objects in context: reply to Nickerson.
Crist WB
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):303-5. PubMed ID: 6457079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus encoding by mentally retarded and nonretarded adults.
Caruso DR; Detterman DK
Am J Ment Defic; 1983 May; 87(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 6869423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of structural diagnostics in recognition.
Fox J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Feb; 104(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 1141836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual and nominal matching of physically dimensioned polygons.
Brabender V; Landrigan DT
Am J Psychol; 1978 Jun; 91(2):331-41. PubMed ID: 677348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Information processing through the first year of life: a longitudinal study using the visual expectation paradigm.
Canfield RL; Smith EG; Brezsnyak MP; Snow KL
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1997; 62(2):1-145. PubMed ID: 9353949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of stimulus probability and visual similarity on stimulus encoding.
Irwin DE; Pachella RG
Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 4003618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of structural and naming factors of letters upon the recognition of tachistoscopic letters (author's transl)].
Kitamori A
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1981 Apr; 52(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 7300053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
Lawson R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceived symmetry and visual matching.
Hershenson M; Ryder J
Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 7168458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pattern recognition in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): the role of the spatial organisation of stimulus parts.
De Lillo C; Spinozzi G; Truppa V
Behav Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 181(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 17467068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrimination is more closely associated with perceived similarity than with distance and color.
King DL; Hauser SR
J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jul; 132(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 16011077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of convexity and concavity in context.
Bertamini M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):775-89. PubMed ID: 18665725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice reaction time: the location of auditory and visual similarity.
Clement DE; Hawkins HL; Hosking KE
Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 4742383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Latency facilitation in temporal-order judgments: time course of facilitation as a function of judgment type.
Scharlau I; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jun; 122(2):129-59. PubMed ID: 16337603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Similarity-based asymmetries in perceptual matching.
Hodgetts CJ; Hahn U
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 22305350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of structure and component in judgments of visual similarity of Chinese characters.
Yeh SL; Li JL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Aug; 28(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 12190259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual processes in matching and recognition of complex pictures.
Lamberts K; Brockdorff N; Heit E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1176-91. PubMed ID: 12421063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
