These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6225833)

  • 1. Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality.
    Seamon JG; Brody N; Kauff DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Jul; 9(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 6225833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized.
    Seamon JG; Marsh RL; Brody N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 6235312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli.
    Patterson K; Bradshaw JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Aug; 1(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 1202147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of lateral implicit visual affective stimuli on the evaluation of neutral stimuli in humans.
    Kobylinska D; Karwowska D
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2007; 67(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 17474325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of concurrent verbal memory on recognition of stimuli from the left and right visual fields.
    Hellige JB; Cox PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):210-21. PubMed ID: 1271028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks.
    Seamon JG; McKenna PA; Binder N
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Mar; 7(1):85-102. PubMed ID: 9521834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masking and visual field effects on a lateralized rod-and-frame test.
    Voyer D; Bryden MP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Mar; 47(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8481710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lateral differences for person perception: effects of task on visual processing of handwriting.
    Bruyer R; Secq K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Dec; 57(3 Pt 2):1023-35. PubMed ID: 6664781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual asymmetry during free viewing of words and faces: The effect of context on recognition.
    Vakil E; Liberman H
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Nov; 109():43-49. PubMed ID: 27643950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symmetrical hemispheric priming in spatial neglect: a hyperactive left-hemisphere phenomenon?
    Nakamura K; Oga T; Takahashi M; Kuribayashi T; Kanamori Y; Matsumiya T; Maeno Y; Yamamoto M
    Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 21292251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performing lateralized approach and avoidance behaviors: effects on perceptual, affective and confidence judgments.
    Dru V; Cretenet J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 Mar; 17(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 21208516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Lateralization of visual perception of letters during reverse masking].
    Miamlin VV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985; 35(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 4024730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defective recognition and naming of famous people from voice in patients with unilateral temporal lobe tumours.
    Papagno C; Mattavelli G; Casarotti A; Bello L; Gainotti G
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 116(Pt B):194-204. PubMed ID: 28733246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two types of image generation: evidence for left and right hemisphere processes.
    Kosslyn SM; Maljkovic V; Hamilton SE; Horwitz G; Thompson WL
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Nov; 33(11):1485-510. PubMed ID: 8584182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual backward masking of selected visemes.
    Teigland AD; Wilson WR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 7120966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A serial test of the laterality of familiar face recognition.
    Kampf M; Nachson I; Babkoff H
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Oct; 50(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 12372350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of altered central and peripheral visual field stimulation on correct recognition and visual evoked response.
    Mancuso RP; Lawrence AF; Hintze RW; White CT
    Int J Neurosci; 1979; 9(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 478749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separate training of hemispheres to perform visual discrimination in conditions of blocking of interhemisphere transmission by masking.
    Glezer VD; Nevskaya AA; Chernova ND; Gauzel'man VE
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2005 Mar; 35(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 15875495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: effects of the stimulus presentation format.
    Windmann S; Daum I; Güntürkün O
    Brain Lang; 2002 Mar; 80(3):269-86. PubMed ID: 11896641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficiency of the forebrain commissures: memory for stimuli seen by the other hemisphere.
    Kavcic V; Doty RW
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2002; 62(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 12659289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.