These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6226527)

  • 1. A clinical comparison of 99mTc-DPD and two 99mTc-MDP agents.
    Vorne M; Vähätalo S; Lantto T
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(9):395-7. PubMed ID: 6226527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of bone imaging with Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication.
    Buell U; Kleinhans E; Zorn-Bopp E; Reuschel W; Muenzing W; Moser EA; Seiderer M
    J Nucl Med; 1982 Mar; 23(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 6460854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between the diagnostic efficacy of 99mTc-MDP, 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-HDP for the detection of bone metastases.
    Pauwels EK; Blom J; Camps JA; Hermans J; Rijke AM
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 6220908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biokinetics of bone tracers by means of deconvolution analysis--comparison of 99mTc MDP, 99mTc DPD and 99mTc EHDP.
    Knop J; Stritzke P; Kröger E; Schneider C; Wasmus G
    Nuklearmedizin; 1982 Aug; 21(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 6216459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of tc-99m MDP, HMDP, and DPD with respect to bone-to-soft tissue ratios.
    Buell U; Kirsch CM; Kleinhans E; Jäger B
    J Nucl Med; 1983 Dec; 24(12):1201-2. PubMed ID: 6227711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 99Tcm-MDP and 99Tcm-DPD in pathologic bone lesions. A visual and quantitative comparison.
    Lantto T; Vorne M; Mokka R; Vähätalo S
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):631-3. PubMed ID: 2960361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which diphosphonate for routine bone scintigraphy (MDP, HDP or DPD)?
    Frühling J; Verbist A; Balikdjian D
    Nucl Med Commun; 1986 Jun; 7(6):415-25. PubMed ID: 3748485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technetium-99m MDP vs technetium-99m dicarboxypropane diphosphonate. A clinical comparison in various pathologic conditions.
    Godart G; Durez M; Bevilacqua M; Abramovici J; Robience Y
    Clin Nucl Med; 1986 Feb; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 3769350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the effect of 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-MDP on experimentally-induced osteoarthritis in the stifle joint of the dog.
    Lee JY; Lee WG; Kim JH; Kang SS; Bae CS; Koong SS; Choi SH
    In Vivo; 2005; 19(4):781-5. PubMed ID: 15999549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The visualization of femoral vessels in delayed bone scans--a sign of arteriosclerosis? A comparison of 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-DPD.
    Lantto T; Järvi K; Toivio I; Vähätalo S; Vorne M
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1989; 15(5):265-8. PubMed ID: 2759127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer analysis of Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP kinetics in humans: concise communication.
    Mele M; Conte E; Fratello A; Pasculli D; Pieralice M; D'Addabbo A
    J Nucl Med; 1983 Apr; 24(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 6834136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the kinetics of methylene-diphosphonate (MDP) and dicarboxypropan-diphosphonic acid (DPD), two radio-diagnostics for bone scintigraphy.
    Schroth HJ; Hausinger F; Garth H; Oberhausen E
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1984; 9(12):529-32. PubMed ID: 6526051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New diphosphonate compounds for skeletal imaging: comparison with methylene diphosphonate.
    Subramanian G; McAfee JG; Thomas FD; Feld TA; Zapf-Longo C; Palladino E
    Radiology; 1983 Dec; 149(3):823-8. PubMed ID: 6316414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical studies on bone deposition of 99mTc-labeled-DPD (dicarboxypropane diphosphonate): a comparison with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate].
    Otsuka N; Yoneda M; Sawai M; Saito J; Nagai K; Muranaka A; Terashima H; Yanagimoto S; Ito Y
    Kaku Igaku; 1982 Dec; 19(10):1573-8. PubMed ID: 6221135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of different bone tracers and acquisition times on image quality of equine bone scintigraphy.
    Mageed M; Dyab S; Swagemakers JH; Gerlach K
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2022 Sep; 63(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 35666549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone lesion detection with carrier-added 99mTc-EDTMP in comparison with 99mTc-DPD.
    Fueger BJ; Mitterhauser M; Wadsak W; Ofluoglu S; Traub T; Karanikas G; Dudczak R; Pirich C
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Apr; 25(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 15097810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical comparison of MDP and DMAD.
    Rosenthall L; Stern J; Arzoumanian A
    Clin Nucl Med; 1982 Sep; 7(9):403-6. PubMed ID: 6214358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 99mTc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate: a new bone imaging agent with a low tin content.
    Domstad PA; Coupal JJ; Kim EE; Blake JS; DeLand FH
    Radiology; 1980 Jul; 136(1):209-11. PubMed ID: 6446106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of bone scintigraphy with 99Tcm-DPD, 99Tcm-HDP and 99Tcm-MDP.
    Bergqvist L; Brismar J; Cederquist E; Darte L; Naversten Y; Palmer J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 6236672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The scintigraphy of sacroiliac joints. A comparison of 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-MDP.
    Lantto T
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1990; 16(8-10):677-81. PubMed ID: 2143475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.