These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6227081)
1. Government intercedes in "Baby Jane Doe". Holden C Science; 1983 Nov; 222(4626):908. PubMed ID: 6227081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe. Paige C; Karnofsky EB J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts. Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. United States v. University Hospital, State Univ. of New York. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Feb; 729():144-63. PubMed ID: 11648496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Baby Jane Doe: stating a cause of action against the officious intermeddler. Vitiello M Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):863-908. PubMed ID: 11655858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants. Brown LD J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):231-54. PubMed ID: 3745838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. v. University Hospital, State Univ. of New York. U.S. District Court, E.D. New York, Long Island Division Fed Suppl; 1983 Nov; 575():607-16. PubMed ID: 11648241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination and Baby Jane. Will GF Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding medical treatment from infants: when is it child neglect? Knepper K Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Winter; 33(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11653286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The survival of Baby Doe. Lancet; 1984 Jan; 1(8370):215. PubMed ID: 11644275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Introduction to the Baby Jane Doe papers. Fox DM J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 11643930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. seeks records of 'Baby Jane Doe'. Barringer F Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Baby Jane' ruling appealed by Justice. Barringer F Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11646367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe. Minow M Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby Jane Doe and other related matters. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1983; 7(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 11651726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails. Curran M Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe. Kerr K Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 6237076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Judge rejects U.S. role in 'Baby Doe' case. Barringer F Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A33. PubMed ID: 11646343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. lawyer concedes point in 'Doe' case. Barringer F Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]