These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 622719)

  • 1. [Clinical experience with the cage electrode EMT 588 K. Threshold--current consumption--postoperative complications (author's transl)].
    Präuer HW; Lampadius M
    Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1978 Feb; 26(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 622719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complications with permanent endocardial electrode systems. A comparison between two types of electrodes.
    Larsson S; Roberts D
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1978; (22):49-52. PubMed ID: 362524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Electrode problems in pacemaker wearers (experiences with three electrode types) (author's transl)].
    Priester G; Gauwerky C; Kugler G; Westermann KW
    Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1975 Apr; 23(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 1079976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Probability of electrode dislocation: the importance of threshold measurements during pacemaker implantation (author's transl)].
    Rényi-Vámos F; Solti F; Gyöngy T; Szabó Z
    Z Kardiol; 1977 Jun; 66(6):310-3. PubMed ID: 899128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low threshold endocaridal electrodes for permanent cardiac pacing. Comparison between one large and two small surface electrodes.
    Wahlberg I; Edhag O; Lagergren HR
    Acta Med Scand; 1977; 201(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 851042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A low-threshold, non-dislocating endocardial electrode.
    Lagergren H; Edhag O; Wahlberg I
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1976 Aug; 72(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 957741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small surface electrodes for cardiac pacing and their effect on the longevity of pacemakers.
    Netusil M
    Cor Vasa; 1972; 20(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 4499915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pacemaker therapy in infants (author's transl)].
    Hagl S; Glet F; Meisner H; Paek SU; Sebening F
    Herz; 1978 Dec; 63(36):374-86. PubMed ID: 554859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative studies of thresholds after implantation of pacemaker leads of different size (author's transl)].
    Kleinert M; Irnich W; Beer P
    Z Kardiol; 1977 Apr; 66(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 857458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New temporary pacing lead for use after cardiac operations.
    Breivik K; Engedal H; Segadal L; Ohm OJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Nov; 84(5):787-94. PubMed ID: 6982379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pacemaker electrodes and problems related to cardiac pacing and sensing: current solutions and future trends.
    Pioger G; Garberoglio B
    Life Support Syst; 1984; 2(3):169-81. PubMed ID: 6503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Five years' experience with an epimyocardial screw-in electrode in cardiac pacemakers].
    Sege D; Reutter FW; Engel UR; Babotai J
    Helv Chir Acta; 1980 Jun; 47(1-2):237-41. PubMed ID: 7440203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Electrode surface areas, pulse duration and stimulation threshold. Acute and chronic study with endocardial unipolar electrodes (author's transl)].
    Antonioli GE; Grassi G; Baggioni GF; Bagni B
    G Ital Cardiol; 1977; 7(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 863147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experience in the use of a new endocardial stimulation electrode].
    Frangini P; Vergara I; González R; Baeza M; Cambón AM
    Rev Med Chil; 2006 Jun; 134(6):749-53. PubMed ID: 17130950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Experience with special-type pacemaker leads (author's transl)].
    Bücking J; Hahner U; Stein J; Voss H
    Z Kardiol; 1981 Mar; 70(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 7234053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Chronic stimulation thresholds using carbon and platinum electrodes].
    Goicolea A; Chicote R; Adoue P; Gómez P; García-Cosío F
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 2326537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Prerequisites for pacemaker electrodes for individual programming of a low stimulation impulse (comparison of an Elgiloy and a steroid-dependent pacemaker electrode)].
    Schuchert A; Kuck KH; Bleifeld W
    Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 2378158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Electrode fracture in pacemaker patients (author's transl)].
    Al-Sukhun M; Bardos P; Messmer BJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1980 Apr; 105(15):520-2. PubMed ID: 7363820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Complications in pacemaker treatment caused by electrodes (author's transl)].
    Nordeck E; Buckesfeld R; Kirchhoff PG; Neubaur J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Jun; 100(23):1282, 1285-8. PubMed ID: 1140085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term performance of transvenous, steroid-eluting, high impedance, passive-fixation ventricular pacing leads.
    Yeh KH; Wang CC; Wen MS; Chou CC; Yeh SJ; Wu D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 27(10):1399-404. PubMed ID: 15511249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.