292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6228539)
1. Ethics committees for infants doe?
Fleischman AR; Murray TH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):5-9. PubMed ID: 6228539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment for seriously ill newborns.
Strain JE
Pediatrics; 1983 Oct; 72(4):572-3. PubMed ID: 6889074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
Horan DJ; Balch BJ
Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
Shapiro RS; Barthel R
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse.
Rhoden NK; Arras JD
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 'Baby Doe'--a medical ethical issue.
Lang GC
West J Med; 1985 Jun; 142(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 4024642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Twenty questions about ethics committees.
Capron AM
Ethics Comm Newsl; 1984 Jun; 1(4):2-10. PubMed ID: 11651761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the impaired newborn.
Moreno JD
Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 3595056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
Gostin L
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns.
Glasow SB
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Neonatologists and bioethics after Baby Doe.
Carter BS
J Perinatol; 1993; 13(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 8515309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioethical review committees in perinatology.
Fleischman AR
Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):379-93. PubMed ID: 3595059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Backsliding on "Baby Doe"?
Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):11, 15. PubMed ID: 10317572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment.
Britton JR
West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional ethics committees. Legitimate and impartial review of ethical health care decisions.
Jaffe GA
J Leg Med; 1989 Sep; 10(3):393-431. PubMed ID: 2607217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe.
Gerry MH; Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict.
Berseth CL
Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
