These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6228749)

  • 1. The Babies Doe: common sense and common decency.
    Curtin LL
    Nurs Manage; 1983 Dec; 14(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 6228749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handicapped babies: a right to life?
    Kuhse H; Singer P
    Nurs Mirror; 1985 Feb; 160(8):17-20. PubMed ID: 3156312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court decisions and the feds: travesty or tragedy?
    Curtin LL
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 6212784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. View from the Nation's Courts.
    Freishtat HW
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1986 Oct; 6(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 2945836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Baby Doe rules.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should we feed baby Doe?
    Curtin L
    Nurs Manage; 1984 Aug; 15(8):22-8. PubMed ID: 6566046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What ever happened to Baby Jane Doe?
    Colen BD
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):2. PubMed ID: 8088998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An introduction to the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc.
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2931397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The right to die: what the President's Commission recommended.
    Nurs Life; 1984; 4(2):50-2. PubMed ID: 6561458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In re Baby K.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1995; 20(5):251. PubMed ID: 7476007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Baby Doe controversy.
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Sep; 315(11):707-8. PubMed ID: 3748076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The plight of the last friend: legal issues for physicians and nurses in providing nutrition and hydration.
    Grant ER; Forsythe CD
    Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):277-99. PubMed ID: 3644806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical futility: when is enough, enough?
    Cultice PN
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Aug; 27(8):225-32, 256. PubMed ID: 10171943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legally speaking. Infanticide: when doctor's orders read "murder".
    Horan DJ
    RN; 1982 Jan; 45(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 6915615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New treatments, new choices.
    Lyon J
    Nurs Life; 1984; 4(2):48-50. PubMed ID: 6561457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quarterly report of the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc.
    Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(3):v-vi. PubMed ID: 9029840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What we learned from a no-code baby.
    Pavill B
    RN; 1984 Nov; 47(11):34-7. PubMed ID: 6568004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. United States Commission on Civil Rights--medical discrimination against children with disabilities: an abstract.
    Boyd DE; Thompson PJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():379-410. PubMed ID: 10170563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The 'Baby Doe' rule: is it all bad?
    Johnson DE; Thompson TR
    Pediatrics; 1984 May; 73(5):729-30. PubMed ID: 6718131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.