These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6229598)

  • 1. Resource allocation and the attentional demands of letter encoding.
    Johnson PJ; Forester JA; Calderwood R; Weisgerber SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Dec; 112(4):616-38. PubMed ID: 6229598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemisphere-specific resource demands of task expectancies.
    Lamberts K; d'Ydewalle G
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1990 Feb; 42(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 2326492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary task modality, expectancy, and the measurement of attentional capacity.
    Proctor RW; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 528962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of preparatory set and task demands on auditory event-related potentials.
    Nash AJ; Williams CS
    Biol Psychol; 1982; 15(1-2):15-31. PubMed ID: 7138998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resources and dual-task performance; resource allocation versus task integration.
    Donk M; Sanders AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1989 Dec; 72(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 2618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory.
    Kellogg RT; Cocklin T; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 7137417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-Interfering Effects of Active Post-Encoding Tasks on Episodic Memory Consolidation in Humans.
    Varma S; Takashima A; Krewinkel S; van Kooten M; Fu L; Medendorp WP; Kessels RPC; Daselaar SM
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2017; 11():54. PubMed ID: 28424596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional resource demands of stimulus encoding for persons with and without mental retardation.
    Merrill EC
    Am J Ment Retard; 1992 Jul; 97(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 1497867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing resources in timing and sequencing tasks.
    Brown SW; Merchant SM
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Apr; 69(3):439-49. PubMed ID: 17672431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Executive attentional resources in timing: Effects of inhibitory control and cognitive aging.
    Brown SW; Johnson TM; Sohl ME; Dumas MK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1063-83. PubMed ID: 26010590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.
    LaBerge D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Jun; 9(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 6223977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional resources in timing: interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks.
    Brown SW
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Oct; 59(7):1118-40. PubMed ID: 9360484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of practice and automaticity in temporal and nontemporal dual-task performance.
    Brown SW; Bennett ED
    Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 11963281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    BMC Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 8():16. PubMed ID: 17316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 1011005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cerebellar damage impairs automaticity of a recently practiced movement.
    Lang CE; Bastian AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 87(3):1336-47. PubMed ID: 11877508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-task interference: attentional and neurophysiological influences.
    Hiraga CY; Garry MI; Carson RG; Summers JJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 205(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 19631693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional resource allocation during a cued saccade task.
    Huddleston WE; Aleksandrowicz MS; Yufa A; Knurr CR; Lytle JR; Puissant MM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 23792667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amount and duration of attentional demands during visual search.
    Madden DJ; Allen PA
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 2740199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.