These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6230345)
1. Assessing raters' policies in evaluating proposed services for transporting the physically handicapped. Allen JS; Muchinsky PM J Appl Psychol; 1984 Feb; 69(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 6230345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The handicapped and public transportation]. Schneider W; Brambring M Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1985 May; 24(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 3160092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Social security for the physically and mentally handicapped and provision for rehabilitation services in East Germany]. Ulbricht H Z Gesamte Hyg; 1981; 27(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 6455866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Policy approaches regarding the impact of graduation requirements on handicapped students. Ross JW; Weintraub FJ Except Child; 1980 Nov; 47(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 6448151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Policy issues concerning HIV-positive children: state education officials' opinions. Hartwig AC; Eckland JD AIDS Public Policy J; 1991; 6(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 11652063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sterilisation and the mentally handicapped. Cooney T Dubl Univ Law J; 1989; 11(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 11659291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Advance directives for severely mentally and physically handicapped adults who have never been competent. Spady DW Bioeth Bull; 1996 Nov; 8(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11660601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sterilization of women who are mentally handicapped. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 63. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Ethics ACOG Comm Opin; 1988 Sep; No. 63():3 p. PubMed ID: 11660331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical decision-making model for addressing the needs of allied health students with disabilities. Sharby N; Roush SE J Allied Health; 2009; 38(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19361024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Delivery of primary care to the physically challenged. Gans BM; Mann NR; Becker BE Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Dec; 74(12 Spec No):S15-9. PubMed ID: 8257284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Programming for chronically disabled persons: the impact of federal financing policies in the political climate of the early 1980s. Ross EC J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1984; 6(4):425-49. PubMed ID: 10317483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The provision of transport for the handicapped. Ashford NJ Ergonomics; 1979 Feb; 22(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 157272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What can health impact assessment add to comparative risk assessment in decision-making? Dora C Bull World Health Organ; 2003; 81(6):460. PubMed ID: 12894333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Public uses Denmark's living will. Dolley M BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6875):414-5. PubMed ID: 11643103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Public local passenger transportation for the handicapped serves all passengers--comprehensive study in München]. Bonk R; Hilsenbeck P; Stickel H Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1990 May; 29(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 2142324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding. Born MA KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Public Law No. 101-336. United States US Statut Large; 1990 Jul; 104():327-78. PubMed ID: 16250114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Medical policies for care for the physically handicapped and aged, from the nurses' viewpoint]. Shimizu A Kango; 1975 Jan; 27(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 123288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing autonomy and choice in selecting and directing long term care services. Kapp MB Elder Law J; 1996; 4(1):55-97. PubMed ID: 15580687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge. See KE J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 19210067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]