These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6230651)

  • 1. [Gastro-esophageal reflux. Treatment with an inert prosthesis, the Angelchik collar].
    Berard P
    Presse Med; 1984 Mar; 13(9):559-61. PubMed ID: 6230651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Angelchik prosthesis behaves as a fundoplication.
    Lee JR; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Mar; 75(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 8476193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the management of failed Angelchik prosthesis.
    Jalil O; Zia MK; Hassn A; Morcous P
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 21190477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Angelchik prosthesis in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux].
    Myrhøj T; Andersen LI; Boesby S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Mar; 151(10):627-9. PubMed ID: 2922832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Wyllie JH; Edwards DA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Jul; 67(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 4037629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraisal of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis based on clinical and manometric data and pH monitoring.
    de Caestecker JS; Ross HM; Heading RC; Macleod IB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1989 Feb; 34(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux: symptomatic and objective assessment.
    Weaver RM; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 4051424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The Angelchik prosthesis in the treatment of hiatal hernia and gastro-esophageal reflux. Motives of a choice].
    Pizzagalli GF; Degrada CT; Franchi P; Panzera M; Gallo E; Gioetto M
    Minerva Chir; 1989 Jan; 44(1-2):123-5. PubMed ID: 2710375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Successful laparoscopic removal of a migrated Angelchik prosthesis.
    Plaisier PW; Lange JF
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Jun; 14(6):592. PubMed ID: 11287994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    Maxwell-Armstrong CA; Steele RJ; Amar SS; Evans D; Morris DL; Foster GE; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1997 Jun; 84(6):862-4. PubMed ID: 9189111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Our experience on the use of the antireflux prosthesis by the Angelchik method (personal contribution of 26 cases)].
    Puchetti V
    Chir Ital; 1989; 41(2-3):145-59. PubMed ID: 2638219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The Angelchik prosthesis--intermediate term evaluation and results].
    Siewert JR; Feussner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):421-9. PubMed ID: 3064455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiology of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastroesophageal reflux.
    Burhenne LJ; Fratkin LB; Flak B; Burhenne HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 6607635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic removal of an Angelchik prosthesis.
    Underwood RA; Weinstock LB; Soper NJ; Quasebarth MA; Brunt LM
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Jun; 13(6):615-7. PubMed ID: 10347303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angelchik prosthesis with oesophageal adenocarcinoma: our surgical approach.
    Shetty VD; Thrumurthy SG; Pursnani KG; Ward JB; Mughal MM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Jul; 92(5):W64-8. PubMed ID: 20626966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reflux versus dysphagia: an objective evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Morris DL; Jones J; Evans DF; Foster G; Smart H; Gregson R; Amar S; Doran J; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1985 Dec; 72(12):1017-20. PubMed ID: 4084744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.