These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Public policy and disabled infants: a sociopolitical perspective. Hahn H Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 2959634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who is responsible for Baby Doe? Andrusko D; Fost N; Horowitz RM; Johnson M; Marchand P; Slack IJ Public Welf; 1984; 42(3):4-9. PubMed ID: 10317487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection. Crossley MA Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical futility: strike two. Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(5):42-3. PubMed ID: 8002312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Death be not proud: medical, ethical and legal dilemmas in resource allocation. Smith GP J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():47-63. PubMed ID: 10282313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical authority and infanticide. Malone PA J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1(1):77-111. PubMed ID: 11658876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of intensive care: new research initiatives and their implications for national health policy. Knaus WA; Draper EA; Wagner DP Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1983; 61(4):561-83. PubMed ID: 6557371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics and economics. Antagonists or allies in making health policy? Fuchs VR West J Med; 1998 Mar; 168(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 9549430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics and the care of critically ill infants and children. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Pediatrics; 1996 Jul; 98(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 8668392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rejecting organs: the organ allocation process and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Whitehead AT Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(4):481-97. PubMed ID: 9876786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns. Glasow SB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On withholding treatment. Guttman FM Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Sep; 111(6):520, 523. PubMed ID: 4414923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The relevance of suffering and identifying with others when allocating resources, and clinical implications of the elasticity of the law. Howe EG J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(3):203-5, 211, 218. PubMed ID: 8219303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The coming clash: patient advocates vs. the public interest. Lamm RD Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1998; 61(4):18-20; discussion 21-5. PubMed ID: 9884610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment program--HHS. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(72):14878-92. PubMed ID: 10270565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]