These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6232343)

  • 61. On the possible dangers of using horizontal word displays in visual field studies.
    Bryden MP
    Brain Cogn; 1986 Jul; 5(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 3756008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The influence of word shading and word length on eye movements during reading.
    Leyland LA; Kirkby JA; Juhasz BJ; Pollatsek A; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):471-86. PubMed ID: 21988376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Eye movements and integrating information across fixations.
    Rayner K; McConkie GW; Ehrlich S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Nov; 4(4):529-44. PubMed ID: 722245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Linked linear mixed models: A joint analysis of fixation locations and fixation durations in natural reading.
    Hohenstein S; Matuschek H; Kliegl R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):637-651. PubMed ID: 27612862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.
    Primativo S; Reilly J; Crutch SJ
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41(3):659-685. PubMed ID: 26901571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effects of word length on eye movement control: The evidence from Arabic.
    Paterson KB; Almabruk AA; McGowan VA; White SJ; Jordan TR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1443-50. PubMed ID: 25690581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
    Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Letter processing during eye fixations in visual search.
    Rayner K; Fisher DL
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Jul; 42(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 3658641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence.
    Lima SD; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Jun; 11(3):272-85. PubMed ID: 3159838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading.
    Johnson RL; Eisler ME
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Nov; 141(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 23089042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. An inhibitory influence of transposed-letter neighbors on eye movements during reading.
    Pagán A; Paterson KB; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):278-84. PubMed ID: 26032225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Binocular rivalry and semantic processing: out of sight, out of mind.
    Zimba LD; Blake R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Oct; 9(5):807-15. PubMed ID: 6227690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Solving the chicken-and-egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading.
    Roy-Charland A; Saint-Aubin J; Lawrence MA; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19801615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Word segmentation by alternating colors facilitates eye guidance in Chinese reading.
    Zhou W; Wang A; Shu H; Kliegl R; Yan M
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):729-740. PubMed ID: 29435825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition?
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):2004-7. PubMed ID: 19133280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.