These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6232345)

  • 1. On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method.
    Logan GD; Cowan WB; Davis KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):276-91. PubMed ID: 6232345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Matzke D; Love J; Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):267-281. PubMed ID: 26822670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.
    Ramautar JR; Slagter HA; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 16616048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.
    Logan GD; Van Zandt T; Verbruggen F; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):66-95. PubMed ID: 24490789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure.
    Band GP; van der Molen MW; Logan GD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Feb; 112(2):105-42. PubMed ID: 12521663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stopping ability in younger and older adults: Behavioral and event-related potential.
    Hsieh S; Lin YC
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 17(2):348-363. PubMed ID: 27896714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stop-signal task difficulty and the right inferior frontal gyrus.
    Hughes ME; Johnston PJ; Fulham WR; Budd TW; Michie PT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():205-13. PubMed ID: 23973765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pure electrophysiology of stopping.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Hoeksma MR; Talsma D; Verbaten MN
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Feb; 55(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15649550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibitory effects on response force in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Ko YT; Alsford T; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):465-77. PubMed ID: 22288696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response inhibition during perceptual decision making in humans and macaques.
    Middlebrooks PG; Schall JD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 24306985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stop-signal task for sheep: introduction and validation of a direct measure for the stop-signal reaction time.
    Knolle F; McBride SD; Stewart JE; Goncalves RP; Morton AJ
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Jul; 20(4):615-626. PubMed ID: 28389761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paradox resolved: Stop signal race model with negative dependence.
    Colonius H; Diederich A
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):1051-1058. PubMed ID: 30272461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of variability of sequence length of go trials preceding a stop trial on ability of response inhibition in stop-signal task.
    Hiraoka K; Kinoshita A; Kunimura H; Matsuoka M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29848189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):955-66. PubMed ID: 22268912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Countermanding saccades in humans.
    Hanes DP; Carpenter RH
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2777-91. PubMed ID: 10492837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2009 May; 33(5):647-61. PubMed ID: 18822313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual response time adaptation in the countermanding performance of rats.
    Beuk J; Beninger RJ; Mechefske E; Paré M
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():200-217. PubMed ID: 27646289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The duration of response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm varies with response force.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van Boxtel GJ; van der Molen MW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Oct; 114(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 14529820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.