These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6235304)

  • 1. The functional radiographic examination of patients with low-back pain: a study of different forms of variations.
    Bronfort G; Jochumsen OH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1984 Jun; 7(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 6235304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumbar motion trends and correlation with low back pain. Part II. A roentgenological evaluation of quantitative segmental motion in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 May; 15(4):224-34. PubMed ID: 1386100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lumbar motion trends and correlation with low back pain. Part I. A roentgenological evaluation of coupled lumbar motion in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J; Peterson C; Thiel H; Sellers T; Dal Mas E; Kirton C; Cassidy D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992; 15(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 1533415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic mobility of the lumbar spine and its relation to clinical back motion.
    Korpi J; Poussa M; Heliövaara M
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1988; 20(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 2970111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative roentgenographic study of the asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar spine.
    Torgerson WR; Dotter WE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1976 Sep; 58(6):850-3. PubMed ID: 134040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study.
    Nathan M; Keller TS
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Sep; 17(7):431-41. PubMed ID: 7989876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chiropractic biomechanical evaluations: validity in myofascial low back pain.
    Brunarski DJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1982 Dec; 5(4):155-61. PubMed ID: 6219180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain patients with and without spondylolisthesis.
    Mierau D; Cassidy JD; McGregor M; Kirkaldy-Willis WH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1987 Apr; 10(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 2953840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interrater reliability of roentgenological evaluation of the lumbar spine in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J; Peterson C; Thiel H; Sellers T; Cassidy D; Ken YH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 May; 13(4):179-89. PubMed ID: 2141056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analytical survey of structural aberrations observed in static radiographic examinations among acute low back cases.
    Reinert OC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1988 Feb; 11(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 2965199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lumbar sagittal mobility and low back symptoms in patients treated with manipulation.
    Burton AK; Tillotson KM; Edwards VA; Sykes DA
    J Spinal Disord; 1990 Sep; 3(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 2151989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress X-rays and the low back pain patient.
    Phillips RB; Howe JW; Bustin G; Mick TJ; Rosenfeld I; Mills T
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990; 13(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 2140121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Instability of the lumbar spine.
    Kirkaldy-Willis WH; Farfan HF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 May; (165):110-23. PubMed ID: 6210480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quantitative evaluation, indications and value of computer tomography of the lumbar spine].
    Lackner K; Schroeder S; Köster O
    Rofo; 1982 Sep; 137(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 6216157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing.
    Landel R; Kulig K; Fredericson M; Li B; Powers CM
    Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar spinal manipulation on trial. Part II--radiological assessment.
    Roberts GM; Roberts EE; Lloyd KN; Burke MS; Evans DP
    Rheumatol Rehabil; 1978 Feb; 17(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 153575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
    Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20065869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic location of vertebrae in digitized videofluoroscopic images of the lumbar spine.
    Muggleton JM; Allen R
    Med Eng Phys; 1997 Jan; 19(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 9140876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thoracic segmental flexion during cervical forward bending.
    Fiebert IM; Spyropoulos T; Peterman D; Dotson L
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 3(4):80-5. PubMed ID: 24573143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.