These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6237092)

  • 1. Goldmann perimetry at the V. A. Hospital: one year follow-up in 65 glaucoma patients.
    Zalta AH; Shock JP
    J Ark Med Soc; 1984 Sep; 81(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 6237092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goldmann perimetry versus tangent screen: the difference in 104 V.A. Hospital glaucoma patients/suspects.
    Zalta AH; Shock JP
    J Ark Med Soc; 1983 Mar; 79(10):344-6. PubMed ID: 6222026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
    Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-year follow-up of treated patients with glaucoma using resolution perimetry.
    Martin L; Wanger P
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Feb; 7(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9493111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glaucoma screening with oculokinetic perimetry in general practice: is its specificity acceptable?
    Christoffersen T; Fors T; Waage S; Holtedahl K
    Eye (Lond); 1995; 9 ( Pt 6 Su)():36-9. PubMed ID: 8729017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of glaucomatous visual fields using the black tangent screen and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Portney GL; Rubenzer MA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1972; 17(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 4137588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Short wavelength perimetry--the significance in diagnosis of glaucoma in myopic patients].
    Herba E; Pojda SM; Zatorska B; Pojda-Wilczek D; Makowiecka-Obidzińska K
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):225-7. PubMed ID: 15510507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What are the options of psychophysical approaches in glaucoma?
    Monhart M
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 52 Suppl 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17998037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modern developments in clinical perimetry.
    Johnson CA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 4(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 10148456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Static perimetry in glaucoma (a comparison with kinetic perimetry).
    Khamar BM
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1982 Jul; 30(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 7166424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of test reliability on the screening performance of frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):585-7. PubMed ID: 16490521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Computerized perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Mocanu C
    Oftalmologia; 1993; 37(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 8338826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Perimetry in the follow-up of glaucoma].
    Gloor B
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1988; 85(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 3065166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Follow-up examinations of papillary morphology with laser scanning tomography].
    Rohrschneider K; Burk RO; Völcker HE
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Dec; 91(6):811-9. PubMed ID: 7849437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Role of static perimetry in assessing the dynamics of the glaucoma after laser intervention].
    Kazakova EL; Akopian VS
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1983; (6):9-12. PubMed ID: 6659251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.