These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6238123)

  • 1. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Color priming affects Stroop interference.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 6866673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference.
    MacLeod CM; Hodder SL
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 9584430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stroop interference and food intake.
    Overduin J; Jansen A; Louwerse E
    Int J Eat Disord; 1995 Nov; 18(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 8556024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.
    Glaser WR; Glaser MO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):13-42. PubMed ID: 2522504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are backward words special for older adults?
    Weir C; Bruun C; Barber T
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Mar; 12(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 9100275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Color-Word Stroop test performance across the adult life span.
    Uttl B; Graf P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):405-20. PubMed ID: 9268815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Stroop congruency effect is more observable under a speed strategy than an accuracy strategy.
    Chen JY; Johnson MK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1945723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presenting two color words on a single Stroop trial: evidence for joint influence, not capture.
    MacLeod CM; Bors DA
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):789-97. PubMed ID: 12219895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity.
    MacLeod CM; Dunbar K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jan; 14(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 2963892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of stroop interference on the categorical perception of color.
    Wiggett JA; Davies IR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18426057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.
    Fuentes LJ; Ortells JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Dec; 84(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 8128904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.