These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6238424)

  • 1. Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients.
    Mayer TG; Tencer AF; Kristoferson S; Mooney V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1984 Sep; 9(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 6238424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain.
    Al-Eisa E; Egan D; Deluzio K; Wassersug R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(3):E71-9. PubMed ID: 16449891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The natural history of idiopathic low back pain. A three-year follow-up study of spinal motion, pain and functional capacity.
    Lankhorst GJ; Van de Stadt RJ; Van der Korst JK
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1985; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 3159080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending in subjects with and without a history of low back pain.
    Esola MA; McClure PW; Fitzgerald GK; Siegler S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jan; 21(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 9122766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations of hip mobility with degree of back pain and lumbar spinal mobility in chronic low-back pain patients.
    Mellin G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Jun; 13(6):668-70. PubMed ID: 2972070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexibility and velocity of the normal and impaired lumbar spine.
    Marras WS; Wongsam PE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Apr; 67(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 2938557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative assessment of back strength using isokinetic testing.
    Langrana NA; Lee CK; Alexander H; Mayott CW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1984 Apr; 9(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 6233716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar spine range of motion as a measure of physical and functional impairment: an investigation of validity.
    Nattrass CL; Nitschke JE; Disler PB; Chou MJ; Ooi KT
    Clin Rehabil; 1999 Jun; 13(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 10392648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbar motion trends and correlation with low back pain. Part II. A roentgenological evaluation of quantitative segmental motion in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 May; 15(4):224-34. PubMed ID: 1386100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in standing and forward bending in women with chronic low back or pelvic girdle pain: indications for physical compensation strategies.
    van Wingerden JP; Vleeming A; Ronchetti I
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(11):E334-41. PubMed ID: 18469680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does movement matter in people with back pain? Investigating 'atypical' lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain using wireless movement sensors.
    Laird RA; Keating JL; Ussing K; Li P; Kent P
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 30658610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardized measurement of lateral spinal flexion and its use in evaluation of the effect of treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Jonsson E; Ljungkvist I; Hamberg J
    Ups J Med Sci; 1990; 95(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 2145682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion.
    Gill K; Krag MH; Johnson GB; Haugh LD; Pope MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Jan; 13(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 3381139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part I: Lumbar mobility.
    Mayer T; Tabor J; Bovasso E; Gatchel RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Feb; 19(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 8178224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normal kinematics of the lumbar spine and pelvis.
    Thurston AJ; Harris JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1983 Mar; 8(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 6857392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Biomechanics of the lumbar spine and posture training].
    Simon L; Herisson C; Brun V; Enjalbert M
    Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic; 1988 Apr; 55(5):415-20. PubMed ID: 2968645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Back pain is associated with changes in loading pattern throughout forward and backward bending.
    Shum GL; Crosbie J; Lee RY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(25):E1472-8. PubMed ID: 21102275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 5: Reliability of range-of-motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso rotation measurement technique.
    Keeley J; Mayer TG; Cox R; Gatchel RJ; Smith J; Mooney V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986; 11(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2939567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.