These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Discrimination of synthetic vowels by using tactile vocoder and a comparison to that of an eight-channel cochlear implant. Ifukube T IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1989 Nov; 36(11):1085-91. PubMed ID: 2530151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid. Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Urbano RC; Pero PJ J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 2739385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychophysical studies relevant to the design of a digital electrotactile speech processor. Blamey PJ; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 2957405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a tactile vocoder for work recognition. Brooks PL; Frost BJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6224830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of vocoder filter configuration on tactual perception of speech. Eilers RE; Ozdamar O; Oller DK; Miskiel E; Urbano R J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(4):51-64. PubMed ID: 2600868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer system for quantitative evaluation of an electrotactile vocoder for artificial hearing. Ozdamar O; Oller DK; Miskiel E; Eilers R Comput Biomed Res; 1988 Feb; 21(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 3345655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual and tactual perception of syllable number in sentence stimuli. Bourgeois MS; Goldstein H J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):367-71. PubMed ID: 6219145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception of multiple electrode stimulus patterns: implications for design of an electrotactile speech processor. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Galvin KL; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):360-8. PubMed ID: 1825833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech. Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Information transmission with a multifinger tactual display. Tan HZ; Durlach NI; Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):993-1008. PubMed ID: 10497422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The transmission of prosodic information via an electrotactile speechreading aid. Grant KW; Ardell LA; Kuhl PK; Sparks DW Ear Hear; 1986 Oct; 7(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 2945747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial discrimination learning of electrocutaneous stimuli is influenced by the type of stimulation. Walter-Walsh K; Weiss T; Spohn D; Torma F; Miltner WH Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1281():47-57. PubMed ID: 19497308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: improving performance through the use of supplementary tactual displays. Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Durlach NI; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Pemberton JC; Mulcahey BD; Washington DL J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):450-65. PubMed ID: 1533433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders. Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of handedness in tactile speech perception. Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(4):423-35. PubMed ID: 8158558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]