100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 624196)
1. Selection of tumors with a poor prognosis in operable carcinoma of the endometrium.
Muirhead W; Roberts JT
Clin Radiol; 1978 Jan; 29(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 624196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Prognostic value of histological variants of adenosquamous carcinoma of the corpus uteri].
Smirnov OA
Vopr Onkol; 1984; 30(3):32-7. PubMed ID: 6710946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discrepancy between curettage and hysterectomy histology in patients with stage 1 uterine malignancy.
Soothill PW; Alcock CJ; MacKenzie IZ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Apr; 96(4):478-81. PubMed ID: 2751963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Architectural (FIGO) grading, nuclear grading, and other prognostic indicators in stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma with identification of high-risk and low-risk groups.
Mittal KR; Schwartz PE; Barwick KW
Cancer; 1988 Feb; 61(3):538-45. PubMed ID: 3338021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endometrioid carcinoma simultaneously involving the uterus and the fallopian tube: a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases.
Culton LK; Deavers MT; Silva EG; Liu J; Malpica A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):844-9. PubMed ID: 16819326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The value of and indications for radiotherapy in endometrial carcinoma].
Kucera H
Strahlenther Onkol; 1991 Jul; 167(7):381-6. PubMed ID: 1858012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the endometrium].
Giordana C; Malinverni G; Rosmino C; Del Tetto F; Ravarino N; Sala S
Radiol Med; 1991 Mar; 81(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 2014343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine serous and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas: is there a survival difference?
Boruta DM; Gehrig PA; Groben PA; Bae-Jump V; Boggess JF; Fowler WC; Van Le L
Cancer; 2004 Nov; 101(10):2214-21. PubMed ID: 15452833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endometrial stromal sarcoma and poorly differentiated endometrial sarcoma.
Evans HL
Cancer; 1982 Nov; 50(10):2170-82. PubMed ID: 7127257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of the pathologic findings in endometrial cancer.
Christopherson WM
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Dec; 13(4):673-93. PubMed ID: 3024898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Squamous differentiation in carcinoma of the endometrium: a critical appraisal of adenoacanthoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
Zaino RJ; Kurman RJ
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1988 May; 5(2):154-71. PubMed ID: 3041509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative prognostic significance of DNA flow cytometry and histologic grading in endometrial carcinoma.
Quillamor RM; Furlong JW; Hoschner JA; Wynn RM
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1988; 26(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 3229666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Endometrial carcinoma and their precursors].
Philippe E; Muller J; Ritter J
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1987 May; 82(5):331-5. PubMed ID: 3602808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenoepidermoid and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterus. A clinicopathologic study of 118 cases.
Julian CG; Daikoku NH; Gillespie A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 128(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 851156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oestrogen use and survival in endometrial cancer.
Collins J; Donner A; Allen LH; Adams O
Lancet; 1980 Nov; 2(8201):961-4. PubMed ID: 6107599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Prognostic significance of morphological parameters in endometrial carcinomas].
Breitenecker G; Bartl W; Endler M; Gring H
Onkologie; 1984 Aug; 7(4):222-35. PubMed ID: 6091011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of endometrial extension from primary carcinoma of the uterinecervix.
Perez CA; Zivnuska F; Askin F; Kumar B; Camel HM; Powers WE
Cancer; 1975 Jun; 35(6):1493-504. PubMed ID: 1148985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prognostic factors in gynecologic cancer].
Yajima A; Sato S
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1988 Aug; 15(8):2209-15. PubMed ID: 3408255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reproducibility of a binary tumor grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, compared with FIGO system and nuclear grading.
Sagae S; Saito T; Satoh M; Ikeda T; Kimura S; Mori M; Sato N; Kudo R
Oncology; 2004; 67(5-6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15713989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Low-grade leiomyosarcoma" and late-recurring smooth muscle tumors of the uterus: a heterogenous collection of frequently misdiagnosed tumors associated with an overall favorable prognosis relative to conventional uterine leiomyosarcomas.
Veras E; Zivanovic O; Jacks L; Chiappetta D; Hensley M; Soslow R
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Nov; 35(11):1626-37. PubMed ID: 21921786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
