These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6242411)

  • 1. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-Word Recognition Need Not Depend on Single-Word Features: Narrative Coherence Counteracts Effects of Single-Word Features that Lexical Decision Emphasizes.
    Teng DW; Wallot S; Kelty-Stephen DG
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1451-1472. PubMed ID: 26861216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming.
    Lacruz I; Folk J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1261-84. PubMed ID: 15513246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task.
    Tillman G; Osth AF; van Ravenzwaaij D; Heathcote A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 28265864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the length effect for words in lexical decision: The role of visual attention.
    Ginestet E; Phénix T; Diard J; Valdois S
    Vision Res; 2019 Jun; 159():10-20. PubMed ID: 30904615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
    Yap MJ; Sibley DE; Balota DA; Ratcliff R; Rueckl J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):597-613. PubMed ID: 25329078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
    Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic size does not matter: "bigger" words are not recognized faster.
    Kang SH; Yap MJ; Tse CS; Kurby CA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 21644189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.
    Lehtonen M; Varjokallio M; Kivikari H; Hultén A; Virpioja S; Hakala T; Kurimo M; Lagus K; Salmelin R
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1245-1269. PubMed ID: 31102191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies.
    Cleland AA; Gaskell MG; Quinlan PT; Tamminen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):104-19. PubMed ID: 16478330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational modelling of the effects of semantic dementia on visual word recognition.
    Coltheart M; Saunders SJ; Tree JJ
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 Mar; 27(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 20658385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.