These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6242411)

  • 21. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.
    Ratcliff R; Gomez P; McKoon G
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):159-82. PubMed ID: 14756592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.
    Gerhand S; Barry C
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jul; 27(4):592-602. PubMed ID: 10479818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aphasic performance on a lexical decision task: multiple meanings and word frequency.
    Gerratt BR; Jones D
    Brain Lang; 1987 Jan; 30(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 3815049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
    Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the role of the upper part of words in lexical access: evidence with masked priming.
    Perea M; Comesaña M; Soares AP; Moret-Tatay C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(5):911-25. PubMed ID: 22293014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
    Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
    Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Jun; 119(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 2141355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 1011005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition.
    Ventura P; Fernandes T; Pereira A; Guerreiro JC; Farinha-Fernandes A; Delgado J; Ferreira MF; Faustino B; Raposo I; Wong AC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2739-2750. PubMed ID: 32077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2000-2017. PubMed ID: 31832892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
    Lété B; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ; Crozier LC
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Jun; 6(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 1863395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cognitive effort and the word frequency effect in recognition and lexical decision.
    Mutter SA; Hashtroudi S
    Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(1):93-116. PubMed ID: 3592027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: an eye-movement study.
    Hutzler F; Conrad M; Jacobs AM
    Brain Lang; 2005 Feb; 92(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 15629488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields.
    Young AW; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 1985 Mar; 24(2):326-58. PubMed ID: 3978409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 11958353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.