These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6242414)

  • 1. Dependence, independence, and emergence of word features.
    Oden GC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 6242414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fuzzy logical model of letter identification.
    Oden GC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):336-52. PubMed ID: 528944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon.
    Paap KR; Newsome SL; Noel RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):413-28. PubMed ID: 6242416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 528961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition.
    Townsend JT; Ashby FG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):834-54. PubMed ID: 6218235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The letter height superiority illusion.
    New B; Doré-Mazars K; Cavézian C; Pallier C; Barra J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):291-8. PubMed ID: 26370216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual interactions in two-word displays: familiarity and similarity effects.
    McClelland JL; Mozer MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Feb; 12(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 2939188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Target letter inclusion in single and multiple word substrings and identification accuracy.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Apr; 115(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3385413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition.
    Grainger J; O'Regan JK; Jacobs AM; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 1549424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The word-superiority effect under conditions that approximate reading.
    Williams MC; Gaffney JB; Solman RT
    Brain Lang; 1985 May; 25(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 4027564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early-visual factors in letter confusions.
    Blommaert FJ
    Spat Vis; 1988; 3(3):199-224. PubMed ID: 3153672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.
    McClelland JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Feb; 2(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 1262797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing effects of stimulus orientation on perception of lateralized words and nonwords.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(12):1693-702. PubMed ID: 12887993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A test of the multiple connections model of reading acquisition.
    Berninger VW; Chen AC; Abbott RD
    Int J Neurosci; 1988 Oct; 42(3-4):283-95. PubMed ID: 3061955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking.
    Fine EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 78(11):831-8. PubMed ID: 11763257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.
    Habekost T; Petersen A; Behrmann M; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):413-36. PubMed ID: 24801564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.