These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6242763)
1. Attention in the processing of complex visual displays: detecting features and their combinations. Farell B J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Feb; 10(1):40-64. PubMed ID: 6242763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Briand KA; Klein RM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 2953853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Wolfe JM; Cave KR; Franzel SL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):419-33. PubMed ID: 2527952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Treisman A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Apr; 8(2):194-214. PubMed ID: 6461717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual feature integration and focused attention: response competition from multiple distractor features. Lavie N Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 9158329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual feature integration with an attention deficit. Arguin M; Cavanagh P; Joanette Y Brain Cogn; 1994 Jan; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 8123263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response effects in the perception of conjunctions of colour and form. Chmiel N Psychol Res; 1989; 51(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 2608863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. Paquet L; Merikle PM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Feb; 14(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 2964508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conjunction of color and form without attention: evidence from an orientation-contingent color aftereffect. Houck MR; Hoffman JE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 May; 12(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 2940323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Representation and selection of relative position. Heathcote A; Mewhort DJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Jun; 19(3):488-516. PubMed ID: 8331312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Before you see it, you see its parts: evidence for feature encoding and integration in preschool children and adults. Thompson LA; Massaro DW Cogn Psychol; 1989 Jul; 21(3):334-62. PubMed ID: 2758784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Serial and parallel search in pattern vision? Steinman SB Perception; 1987; 16(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 3432034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional selection of objects or features: evidence from a modified search task. Mounts JR; Melara RD Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):322-41. PubMed ID: 10089764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. Keele SW; Cohen A; Ivry R; Liotti M; Yee P J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Aug; 14(3):444-52. PubMed ID: 2971772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The speed of feature-based attention: attentional advantage is slow, but selection is fast. Huang L J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1382-90. PubMed ID: 20718572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conjoining auditory and visual features during high-rate serial presentation: processing and conjoining two features can be faster than processing one. Woods DL; Alain C; Ogawa KH Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9529908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]