BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6251939)

  • 1. Abdominal wound closure: a trial of Prolene and Dexon.
    Cameron AE; Gray RC; Talbot RW; Wyatt AP
    Br J Surg; 1980 Jul; 67(7):487-8. PubMed ID: 6251939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon.
    Lewis RT; Wiegand FM
    Can J Surg; 1989 May; 32(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2540896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure.
    Cameron AE; Parker CJ; Field ES; Gray RC; Wyatt AP
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 May; 69(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 3111339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
    Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
    Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
    Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS
    Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations.
    Corman ML; Veidenheimer MC; Coller JA
    Am J Surg; 1981 Apr; 141(4):510-13. PubMed ID: 6452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominal wound closure with a continuous monofilament polypropylene suture. Experience with 1,000 consecutive cases.
    Knight CD; Griffen FD
    Arch Surg; 1983 Nov; 118(11):1305-8. PubMed ID: 6357147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abdominal wound healing: a prospective clinical study.
    Irvin TT; Stoddard CJ; Greaney MG; Duthie HL
    Br Med J; 1977 Aug; 2(6083):351-2. PubMed ID: 329940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
    Bucknall TE; Ellis H
    Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 6264641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure.
    Bloemen A; van Dooren P; Huizinga BF; Hoofwijk AG
    Br J Surg; 2011 May; 98(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 21254041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The closure of abdominal wounds in cancer patients.
    Gallitano AL; Kondi ES
    J Surg Oncol; 1976; 8(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 136551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Closure of the abdominal fascia after clean and clean-contaminated laparotomy.
    Larsen PN; Nielsen K; Schultz A; Mejdahl S; Larsen T; Moesgaard F
    Acta Chir Scand; 1989 Sep; 155(9):461-4. PubMed ID: 2531963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial.
    Krukowski ZH; Cusick EL; Engeset J; Matheson NA
    Br J Surg; 1987 Sep; 74(9):828-30. PubMed ID: 3117165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the type of suture material contribute to the strength of the lateral paramedian incision?
    Donaldson DR; Hall TJ; Zoltowski JA; Guillou PJ; Brennan TG
    Br J Surg; 1982 Mar; 69(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 6279223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Theory and practice of continuous laparotomy suture (abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia)].
    Stelzner F
    Chirurg; 1988 Oct; 59(10):654-60. PubMed ID: 2973974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early laparotomy wound dehiscence: a randomized comparison of three suture materials and two methods of fascial closure.
    Savolainen H; Ristkari S; Mokka R
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(3):111-3. PubMed ID: 2851958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy.
    Sajid MS; Parampalli U; Baig MK; McFall MR
    Int J Surg; 2011; 9(8):615-25. PubMed ID: 22061310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies.
    Bucknall TE; Cox PJ; Ellis H
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Mar; 284(6320):931-3. PubMed ID: 6279229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing.
    Osther PJ; Gjøde P; Mortensen BB; Mortensen PB; Bartholin J; Gottrup F
    Br J Surg; 1995 Aug; 82(8):1080-2. PubMed ID: 7648158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.