BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6252831)

  • 21. Aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacilli in a community hospital: comparative in vitro activity of cefotaxime, moxalactam, cefoperazone, and piperacillin.
    Magnussen CR; Sammartino MT; Ernest KD
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Jul; 22(1):154-6. PubMed ID: 6289736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin in comparison with cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime.
    Verbist L; Verhaegen J
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Mar; 19(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 6264844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Antibacterial activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin in comparison with cefotaxime, lamoxactam, cefoperazone, piperacillin gentamicin.
    Braveny I; Machka K; Elsser R
    Infection; 1982 Jan; 10(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6279523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative synergistic activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam, and carbenicillin, combined with tobramycin, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Mintz L; Drew WL
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Feb; 19(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 6289731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Comparison of antimicrobial activity and stability to beta-lactamases of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, lamoxactam and ceftriaxon].
    Baumgärtner M; Grehn M; Wundt W
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Jun; 252(2):208-21. PubMed ID: 6289564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences among moxalactam, cefoperazone, and cefotaxime in activity against multiple-antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria.
    Preston DA
    Rev Infect Dis; 1982; 4 Suppl():S516-21. PubMed ID: 6296965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro activities of cefotaxime and moxalactam (LY127935) against Haemophilus influenzae.
    Jorgensen JH; Crawford SA; Alexander GA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Mar; 17(3):516-7. PubMed ID: 6252832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to cefoperazone, cefotaxime and moxalactam, with special reference to isolates resistant to aminoglycosides, carbenicillin and ticarcillin.
    Woolfrey BF; Fox JM; Quall CO
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1981 Sep; 8(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 6270052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combination of mezlocillin and azlocillin with cephalosporin antibiotics: cefoxitin, cefoperazone, cefotaxime and moxalactam.
    Neu HC; Labthavikul P
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1982 Jan; 9 Suppl A():101-6. PubMed ID: 6281229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro comparison of three new cephalosporins: LY-127935, cefotaxime and cefoperazone.
    Trager GM; White GW; Zimelis VM; Bryk DA; Panwalker AP
    Chemotherapy; 1981; 27(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 6260435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro susceptibility of gram-negative bacilli from pediatric patients to moxalactam, cefotaxime, Ro 13-9904, and other cephalosporins.
    Shelton S; Nelson JD; McCracken GH
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Sep; 18(3):476-9. PubMed ID: 6252837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative activity of cefotaxime and selected beta-lactam antibiotics against Haemophilus influenzae and aerobic gram-negative bacilli.
    Dabernat HJ; Delmas C
    Rev Infect Dis; 1982; 4 Suppl():S401-5. PubMed ID: 6294790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative in vitro activities of N-formimidoyl thienamycin and moxalactam against nonfermentative aerobic gram-negative rods.
    O'Donnell ED; Freimer EH; Gilardi GL; Raeder R
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Apr; 21(4):673-5. PubMed ID: 6211143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [In vitro antibacterial activity of cefodizime (HR 221) on 323 hospital strains of Gram negative bacilli. Comparison with cefotiam, cefoperazone, cefotetan and cefotaxime].
    Le Noc P; Bryskier A; Le Noc D
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 May; 33(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 3897972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro evaluation of cefoperazone.
    Hinkle AM; LeBlanc BM; Bodey GP
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Mar; 17(3):423-7. PubMed ID: 6448578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlation of moxalactam (LY127935) susceptibility tests by disk diffusion and agar plate dilution methods.
    Hall WH; Opfer BJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Jan; 19(1):130-3. PubMed ID: 6454380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative in vitro studies of Ro 13-9904, a new cephalosporin derivative.
    Eickhoff TC; Ehret J
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Mar; 19(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 6264845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the beta-lactamase stability and the in-vitro activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefsulodin, ceftazidime, moxalactam and ceftriaxone against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Livermore DM; Williams RJ; Williams JD
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1981 Oct; 8(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 6271726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative evaluation of moxalactam: antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, adverse reactions, and clinical efficacy.
    Fitzpatrick BJ; Standiford HC
    Pharmacotherapy; 1982; 2(4):197-212. PubMed ID: 6221237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro activity of ceftazidime and ceftriaxone.
    Keenholtz SL; Jacobus NV; Tally FP; Gorbach SL
    Clin Ther; 1983; 5(6):603-16. PubMed ID: 6313195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.