These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6256783)

  • 1. Computer calculation of the dose distribution in the electron build-up region.
    Galvin JM; Wallace RE; Bloch P; Cheng E
    Phys Med Biol; 1980 Sep; 25(5):903-11. PubMed ID: 6256783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer generated scatter dose distributions for 6-MV radiotherapy photon beams.
    Bloch P; Wallace R
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 460065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric comparison of treatment planning systems in irradiation of breast with tangential fields.
    Cheng CW; Das IJ; Tang W; Chang S; Tsai JS; Ceberg C; De Gaspie B; Singh R; Fein DA; Fowble B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jul; 38(4):835-42. PubMed ID: 9240653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
    Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Final Aperture Superposition Technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves.
    Faddegon BA; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3286-94. PubMed ID: 16370417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linac-based isocentric electron-photon treatment of radically operated breast carcinoma with enhanced dose uniformity in the field gap area.
    Tenhunen M; Nyman H; Strengell S; Vaalavirta L
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 19433339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo linear accelerator simulation of megavoltage photon beams: independent determination of initial beam parameters.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Kylling A; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22225273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple technique to improve calculated skin dose accuracy in a commercial treatment planning system.
    Wang L; Cmelak AJ; Ding GX
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 29411506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dosimetric characterization of a multileaf collimator].
    Stasi M; Baiotto B; Palamara F; Gabriele P; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 10432971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Build-up and surface dose measurements on phantoms using micro-MOSFET in 6 and 10 MV x-ray beams and comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Xiang HF; Song JS; Chin DW; Cormack RA; Tishler RB; Makrigiorgos GM; Court LE; Chin LM
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17500458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo photon beam modeling and commissioning for radiotherapy dose calculation algorithm.
    Toutaoui A; Ait chikh S; Khelassi-Toutaoui N; Hattali B
    Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):833-7. PubMed ID: 24947967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac.
    Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
    Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of broad beam central axis depth dose curves from different accelerators using the universal depth dose curve model.
    Werner BL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 364():35-41. PubMed ID: 6316738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical factors affecting absorbed dose to the skin from cobalt-60 gamma rays and 25-MV x rays.
    Gagnon WF; Horton JL
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 113655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of initial electron beam characteristics on monte carlo calculated absorbed dose distributions for linear accelerator electron beams.
    Björk P; Knöös T; Nilsson P
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Nov; 47(22):4019-41. PubMed ID: 12476980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The flatness of Siemens linear accelerator x-ray fields.
    Faddegon BA; O'Brien P; Mason DL
    Med Phys; 1999 Feb; 26(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 10076978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm to electron arc therapy.
    Chi PC; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G; Boyd RA; Tucker SL; Antolak JA
    Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2369-83. PubMed ID: 16898439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.