These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6260044)
1. Mechanical properties of suture materials: an important characterization. Chu CC Ann Surg; 1981 Mar; 193(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 6260044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. Tajirian AL; Goldberg DJ J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2010 Dec; 12(6):296-302. PubMed ID: 21142740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture. Hennessey DB; Carey E; Simms CK; Hanly A; Winter DC J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():168-73. PubMed ID: 22762905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures. Kim JC; Lee YK; Lim BS; Rhee SH; Yang HC J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Dec; 18(12):2363-9. PubMed ID: 17569012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of saline conditions on the tensile strength of ophthalmic sutures. Brauner SC; Berry JL; Pye J; Lee EG; Rhee DJ Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 21117584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials. Chu CC; Kizil Z Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress relaxation and creep: viscoelastic properties of common suture materials used for flexor tendon repair. Vizesi F; Jones C; Lotz N; Gianoutsos M; Walsh WR J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Feb; 33(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 18294547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro evaluation of the stability of mechanical properties of surgical suture materials in various pH conditions. Chu CC; Moncrief G Ann Surg; 1983 Aug; 198(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 6870380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for microsurgical vasovasostomy in rats. Sheynkin YR; Li PS; Magid ML; Carlson D; Chen EC; Goldstein M Urology; 1999 Jun; 53(6):1235-8. PubMed ID: 10367861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair. Lawrence TM; Davis TR J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):836-41. PubMed ID: 16039381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of pH on the in vitro degradation of poly(glycolide lactide) copolymer absorbable sutures. Chu CC J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Mar; 16(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 7061530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in microsurgery: standardized comparable studies in rats. Thiede A; Lütjohann K; Beck C; Blunck F J Microsurg; 1979; 1(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 16317948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl). Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Stress Relaxation Process in Sutures Tied with a Surgeon's Knot in a Simulated Biological Environment. Liber-Kneć A; Łagan S Polim Med; 2016; 46(2):111-116. PubMed ID: 28397451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [In vivo investigations on suture reactions under sterile and not sterile conditions. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials (author's transl)]. Thiede A; Lünstedt B Zentralbl Chir; 1979; 104(9):568-81. PubMed ID: 525088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histologic response to microsuture materials. Beauchamp PJ; Guzick DS; Held B; Schmidt WA J Reprod Med; 1988 Jul; 33(7):615-23. PubMed ID: 2845074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]