These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6260044)

  • 21. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff.
    Gerber C; Schneeberger AG; Beck M; Schlegel U
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 May; 76(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 8175836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
    Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Knotting and handling characteristics of coated synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Rodeheaver GT; Thacker JG; Owen J; Strauss M; Masterson T; Edlich RF
    J Surg Res; 1983 Dec; 35(6):525-30. PubMed ID: 6317984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Suture materials and suturing techniques.
    Campbell JR; Marks A
    In Pract; 1985 May; 7(3):72-5. PubMed ID: 2991140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.
    Abiri A; Paydar O; Tao A; LaRocca M; Liu K; Genovese B; Candler R; Grundfest WS; Dutson EP
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3258-3270. PubMed ID: 27928670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the effect of pH on the biodegradation of two synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Chu CC
    Ann Surg; 1982 Jan; 195(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 6275809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical properties of suture materials in general and cutaneous surgery.
    Naleway SE; Lear W; Kruzic JJ; Maughan CB
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2015 May; 103(4):735-42. PubMed ID: 25045025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure.
    Rodeheaver GT; Nesbit WS; Edlich RF
    Ann Surg; 1986 Aug; 204(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 3017248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Material properties of ophthalmic sutures after sterilization and disinfection.
    Shuttleworth GN; Vaughn LF; Hoh HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Sep; 25(9):1270-4. PubMed ID: 10476513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanical properties of coated absorbable multifilament suture materials.
    Stone JK; von Fraunhofer JA; Masterson BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May; 67(5):737-40. PubMed ID: 3008056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Miller׳s knot as an alternative to the surgical knotting? Characterization of the mechanical behavior.
    Ortillés A; Rodríguez J; Calvo B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Oct; 38():154-62. PubMed ID: 25058024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Old habits tie hard: an in vitro comparison of first-throw tension holding in Polyglycolic acid (Dexon S) and Polyglactin 910 (Coated Vicryl).
    Kersey TL; Patel S; Thaller VT
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 34(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 16626430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stress relaxation of organic suture materials.
    Metz SA; von Fraunhofer JA; Masterson BJ
    Biomaterials; 1990 Apr; 11(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 2161688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Basic suture materials and suturing techniques.
    Ratner D; Nelson BR; Johnson TM
    Semin Dermatol; 1994 Mar; 13(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 8155508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Polydioxanon (PDS)--a new monofilar synthetic, absorbable suture material. Tensile strength studies in a controlled clinical trial on the large intestine of humans and physical parameters in in vitro tests].
    Lündstedt B; Thiede A
    Chirurg; 1983 Feb; 54(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 6406180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of suture material characteristics in an in vitro experimental model.
    Justan I
    Acta Chir Plast; 2010; 52(2-4):45-8. PubMed ID: 21749010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro comparison of mechanical and degradation properties of equivalent absorbable suture materials from two different manufacturers.
    de la Puerta B; Parsons KJ; Draper ER; Moores AL; Moores AP
    Vet Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 21223313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Synthetic resorbable and synthetic non-resorbable suture materials in microvascular surgery. Animal experimental study].
    Dahlke H; Dociu N; Thurau K
    Handchirurgie; 1979; 11(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 393576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Synthetic absorbable and nonabsorbable microsutures: a histological comparison.
    Driscoll GL; Baird PJ; Merkelbach PJ; Smith DH
    Clin Reprod Fertil; 1982 Jun; 1(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 7186830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.