123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6268242)
1. Toxic effect of sampling swabs and transportation test tubes on the formation of intracytoplasmic inclusions of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures.
Mårdh PA; Zeeberg B
Br J Vener Dis; 1981 Aug; 57(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 6268242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sampling and specimen handling in the diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Kallings I; Mårdh PA
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1982; 32():21-4. PubMed ID: 6958018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of calcium alginate-tipped aluminum swabs transported in Culturettes containing ampules of 2-sucrose phosphate medium for recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Smith TF; Weed LA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Aug; 80(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 6349325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of the type of swab on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis].
Giovannini N; Suárez de Basnec MC; Zapata M
Rev Argent Microbiol; 1991; 23(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 1815280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture.
Lees MI; Newnan DM; Plackett M; Traynor PW; Forsyth JR; Garland SM
Genitourin Med; 1990 Aug; 66(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 2202656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking cell cultures to the patient in an attempt to improve chlamydial isolation.
Ngeow YF; Munday PE; Evans RT; Taylor-Robinson D
Br J Vener Dis; 1981 Feb; 57(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 7008897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effect of the choice of sampling swabs and handling of tubes on the results of Chlamydia cultures].
Märdh PA
Rev Int Trach Pathol Ocul Trop Subtrop Sante Publique; 1982; (2-3):41-7. PubMed ID: 6322271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.
Stamm WE; Tam M; Koester M; Cles L
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):666-8. PubMed ID: 6189852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs.
Van Der Pol B; Ferrero DV; Buck-Barrington L; Hook E; Lenderman C; Quinn T; Gaydos CA; Lovchik J; Schachter J; Moncada J; Hall G; Tuohy MJ; Jones RB
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):1008-16. PubMed ID: 11230419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of mitomycin-C treated McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
Woodland RM; Kirton RP; Darougar S
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 3126059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells.
Ripa KT; Mårdh PA
J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Oct; 6(4):328-31. PubMed ID: 562356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should we consider alternatives to combined cervical and urethral swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in females?
Mahto M; Mallinson H
Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):335-6. PubMed ID: 17611234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved method for isolation and growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells treated with cycloheximide using polyethylene glycol.
Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 38(9):1052-4. PubMed ID: 3900144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of iodine- and fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibodies for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cells grown in glass vials.
Wilson DJ; Smith TF; Ilstrup DM
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1984 Jan; 2(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6399479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early detection of chlamydial inclusions combining the use of cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells and immunofluorescence staining.
Thomas BJ; Evans RT; Hutchinson GR; Taylor-Robinson D
J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Sep; 6(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 71306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients.
Sugunendran H; Birley HD; Mallinson H; Abbott M; Tong CY
Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Dec; 77(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 11714940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of sonicated and nonsonicated specimens for the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Warford AL; Carter TL; Levy RA; Rekrut KA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 83(5):625-9. PubMed ID: 3887896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.
Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D
Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recovery of Chlamydia and Genital Mycoplasma transported in sucrose phosphate buffer and urease color test medium.
Smith TF; Weed LA; Pettersen GR; Segura JW
Health Lab Sci; 1977 Jan; 14(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 319081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical sampling for diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection with a new brush device.
Svensson LO; Domeika M; Mårdh PA
Genitourin Med; 1993 Oct; 69(5):397-9. PubMed ID: 8244362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]