These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 627853)

  • 1. Role of visual familiarity in the word-superiority effects obtained with the simultaneous-matching task.
    Bruder GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Feb; 4(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 627853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of form familiarity on perception of words, pseudowords, and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres.
    Jordan TR; Redwood M; Patching GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 May; 15(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 12803965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthography and familiarity effects in word processing.
    Carr TH; Posner MI; Pollatsek A; Snyder CR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):389-414. PubMed ID: 528909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Familiarity affects visual processing of words.
    Pollatsek A; Well AD; Schindler RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Nov; 1(4):328-38. PubMed ID: 1185120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task.
    Chambers SM; Forster KI
    Mem Cognit; 1975 Sep; 3(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 24203880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A visual-familiarity account of evidence for orthographic processing in baboons (Papio papio).
    Vokey JR; Jamieson RK
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Apr; 25(4):991-6. PubMed ID: 24503872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.
    McClelland JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Feb; 2(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 1262797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual word form familiarity and attention in lateral difference during processing Japanese Kana words.
    Nakagawa A; Sukigara M
    Brain Lang; 2000 Sep; 74(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 10950916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. List constituency and orthographic and phonological processing: a shift to high familiarity words from low familiarity words.
    Rutherford BJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():74-81. PubMed ID: 25455570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords.
    Reber R; Zimmermann TD; Wurtz P
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1105-14. PubMed ID: 15751469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus familiarity modifies perceived duration in prerecognition visual processing.
    Avant LL; Lyman PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Aug; 1(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 1202142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The acronym superiority effect.
    Laszlo S; Federmeier KD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1158-63. PubMed ID: 18229490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.
    Habekost T; Petersen A; Behrmann M; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):413-36. PubMed ID: 24801564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform.
    Coch D; Mitra P
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1329():159-74. PubMed ID: 20211607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Features versus redundancy: comments on Massaro, Venezky, and Taylor's "Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings".
    Krueger LE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 528896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for several components of word familiarity.
    Cordier F; Ny JF
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 Aug; 37(3):528-37. PubMed ID: 16405150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.