110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6278846)
21. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. VII. Influence of vehicle osmolarity on biopsy quality.
Willén H; Willén R; Stendahl U
Acta Radiol Oncol; 1983; 22(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 6316747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. DNA patterns and aggressive histopathologic features in 159 patients with cervical carcinoma.
Strang P; Lindgren A; Frankendal B; Stendahl U
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1988; 7(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 3350617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [A new prognostic instrument. Histopathological multi-factor analysis of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Willén H; Willén R; Tropé C
Lakartidningen; 1985 Feb; 82(6):394-7. PubMed ID: 3982163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Does adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix have a worse prognosis than squamous carcinoma?].
Recoules-Arche A; Rouzier R; Rey A; Villefranque V; Haie-Meder C; Pautier P; Pomel C; Lhommé C; Duvillard P; Castaigne D; Morice P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Feb; 32(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 15123133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Survival of advanced age females with cervical carcinoma.
Chapman GW
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Sep; 46(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 1526506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic value of mitotic activity, eosinophilic and inflammatory reaction in stage I cancer of the uterine cervix.
Ayhan A; Altintaş A; Tuncer ZS; Küçükali T; Yüce K
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Jun; 18(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 1607039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tumor-free distance from outermost layer of cervix is of prognostic value in surgically treated cervical cancer patients: a multicenter study.
Saatli B; Olgan S; Gorken IB; Uslu T; Saygili U; Dicle N; Cingillioglu B; Gumurdulu D; Guzel AB; Koyuncuoglu M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1331-5. PubMed ID: 24435497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic model in patients with early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a combination of invasive margin pathological characteristics and lymphovascular space invasion.
Khunamornpong S; Lekawanvijit S; Settakorn J; Sukpan K; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(11):6935-40. PubMed ID: 24377504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. LRIG2 in contrast to LRIG1 predicts poor survival in early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Hedman H; Lindström AK; Tot T; Stendahl U; Henriksson R; Hellberg D
Acta Oncol; 2010 Aug; 49(6):812-5. PubMed ID: 20553099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Significant effects of lymph and blood vascular invasion on the prognosis of early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Zhang Y; Yan M; He J; Sun J; Sun X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 20846259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Utility of mean nuclear volume in predicting disease-free survival in locally advanced invasive cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Jain D; Rajesh L; Srinivasan R; Dey P; Patel FD
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2004 Aug; 26(4):230-2. PubMed ID: 15457676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Malignancy grading, pattern of invasion, and juxtatumoral stromal response (desmoplastic change) in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Horn LC; Hentschel B; Braumann UD
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Oct; 27(4):606-7. PubMed ID: 18753956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. VI. Prediction value of non-keratinizing, parakeratotic and orthokeratotic cell forms and clinical staging.
Willén H; Willén R; Stendahl U
Acta Radiol Oncol; 1982; 21(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 6305117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic value of a malignancy grading system in treatment of recurrent cervical carcinoma.
Sorbe B; Lannes P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1986 Apr; 24(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 2874084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Histologic grade and prognosis of carcinoma of the cervix.
Chung CK; Stryker JA; Ward SP; Nahhas WA; Mortel R
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 7219913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Follow-up study of 232 patients with stage Ia1 and 411 patients with stage Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (microinvasive carcinoma).
Kolstad P
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Jun; 33(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 2722048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tumor virulence as a function of ultrastructural morphology and lymphatic invasion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri: a preliminary study.
Chen SS; Spiegelman I; Cohen CJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1976 Jun; 4(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 986343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix].
Inoue Y; Noda K
Gan No Rinsho; 1989 Oct; 35(13):1610-4. PubMed ID: 2685397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Histopathologic prognostic factors in stage II and III squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. An evaluation of 91 patients treated primarily with radiation therapy.
Crissman JD; Budhraja M; Aron BS; Cummings G
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1987; 6(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 3692673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Uterus corpus extension of primary cervical carcinoma IIA-IIB].
Smutek J; Wójcik D; Mielnik J; Jurczak-Czaplicka M; Gniadek R
Ginekol Pol; 2001 Aug; 72(8):618-23. PubMed ID: 11599246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
