These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 627904)
1. An intuitive approach to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Turner DA J Nucl Med; 1978 Feb; 19(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 627904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Beck JR; Shultz EK Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Jan; 110(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 3753562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of interlaboratory survey date in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) indices. Hermann GA; Herrera N; Sugiura HT J Nucl Med; 1982 Jun; 23(6):525-31. PubMed ID: 7077404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. Metz CE J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure. Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Receiver operating curve, an aid in decision making. Principles and applications illustrated with some examples]. Vinatier D; Monnier JC J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(8):981-9. PubMed ID: 3069898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance. Moores BM; Mattsson S; Månsson LG; Panzer W; Regulla D; Dance D; Alm Carlsson G; Verdun FR; Buhr E; Hoeschen C Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):450-7. PubMed ID: 15933154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology]. Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Setting the optimal erythrocyte protoporphyrin screening decision threshold for lead poisoning: a decision analytic approach. DeBaun MR; Sox HC Pediatrics; 1991 Jul; 88(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 2057248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can you handle the truth (and know it when you see it)? Understanding sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and ROC curves. Cotter K; Peipert JF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 16213422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of imaging tests: Part I--The basics. Royal HD Med Instrum; 1983; 17(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 6646016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The meaning of a "negative" examination. Jaffe CC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Feb; 134(2):414-5. PubMed ID: 6766264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supporting diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactive disorder with novelty detection. Lee HJ; Cho S; Shin MS Artif Intell Med; 2008 Mar; 42(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 18187311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design and analysis of qualitative collaborative studies: minimum collaborative program. McClure FD J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1990; 73(6):953-60. PubMed ID: 2289928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial: Radiology and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Andrus WS; Bird KT Chest; 1975 Apr; 67(4):378-9. PubMed ID: 1122763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]