These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6283791)
1. Dosimetric intercomparison at the Scandinavian radiation therapy centres. I. Absorbed dose intercomparison. Johansson KA; Mattsson LO; Svensson H Acta Radiol Oncol; 1982; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6283791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dosimetric intercomparison of kilovoltage X-rays, megavoltage photons and electrons in the Republic of Ireland. Nisbet A; Thwaites DI; Sheridan ME Radiother Oncol; 1998 Jul; 48(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 9756178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dosimetric intercomparison of electron beams in UK radiotherapy centres. Nisbet A; Thwaites DI Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2393-409. PubMed ID: 9434296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality assurance control in the EORTC cooperative group of radiotherapy. 2. Dosimetric intercomparison. Johansson KA; Horiot JC; Van Dam J; Lepinoy D; Sentenac I; Sernbo G Radiother Oncol; 1986 Nov; 7(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 3809589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose intercomparison at the radiotherapy centres in The Netherlands. 1. Photon beams under reference conditions and for prostatic cancer treatment. Wittkämper FW; Mijnheer BJ; van Kleffens HJ Radiother Oncol; 1987 May; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3602428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. LiF dosimetric studies of cavity displacement effect and reference depths for electron beams. Fregene AO Med Phys; 1976 SEP-OCT; 3(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 824543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dosimetric intercomparison of megavoltage photon beams in UK radiotherapy centres. Thwaites DI; Williams JR; Aird EG; Klevenhagen SC; Williams PC Phys Med Biol; 1992 Feb; 37(2):445-61. PubMed ID: 1553393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intercomparison of Nordic therapy level exposure secondary standards for 60Co gamma radiation. Järvinen H; Lindborg L Acta Radiol Oncol; 1982; 21(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 6293262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An experimental evaluation of recent electron dosimetry codes of practice. Nisbet A; Thwaites DI; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):1999-2014. PubMed ID: 9725585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols. Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A thermoluminescence system for the intercomparison of absorbed dose and radiation quality of X-rays with a HVL of 0-1 to 3-0 mm Cu. Puite KJ Phys Med Biol; 1976 Mar; 21(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 1257302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks. Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric audits of photon beams in radiation therapy centres in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. da Rosa LA; Brito RR; Gonçalves M; de Paiva E; Dovales AC; Freire BL; Giannoni RA; Di Prinzio R; Velasco AF; Castelo LH; Oliveira RV Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(2):272-5. PubMed ID: 18503063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose intercomparison at the radiotherapy centers in The Netherlands. 3. Characteristics of electron beams. Wittkämper FW; Mijnheer BJ Radiother Oncol; 1993 May; 27(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 8356226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality control of radiotherapy centres in Europe: beam calibration. Dutreix A; Derreumaux S; Chavaudra J; van der Schueren E Radiother Oncol; 1994 Sep; 32(3):256-64. PubMed ID: 7816944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of recent codes of practice for high-energy photon dosimetry. Mijnheer BJ; Wittkämper FW Phys Med Biol; 1986 Apr; 31(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 3090570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs. Chibani O; Ma CM Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 12945965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration. Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG; Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absorbed Dose to Water Determination Using IAEA, HPA, NACP, AAPM, NCRP and ICRU Protocols for 1.25 MeV Gamma Ray 6 MV and 10 MV X-Rays: An Intercomparison of Results when IAEA was taken as a Standard Protocol. Dolah MT; Samat SB; Kadni T Malays J Med Sci; 2000 Jan; 7(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 22844215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]