These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6288788)

  • 1. A clinical comparison of a quartz- and glass-filled composite with a glass-filled composite.
    Heuer GA; Garman TA; Sherrer JD; Williams HA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Aug; 105(2):246-7. PubMed ID: 6288788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between particle size of barium glass filler and water sorption of light-cured composite resin.
    Tarumi H; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    Dent Mater J; 1995 Jun; 14(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8940544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage reduction using glass-ceramic inserts.
    Godder B; Zhukovsky L; Trushkowsky R; Epelboym D
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 8054188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developments in composite resins.
    McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1984 Dec; 157(12):440-4. PubMed ID: 6099134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Light scattering and gloss of an experimental quartz-filled composite.
    Campbell PM; Johnston WM; O'Brien WJ
    J Dent Res; 1986 Jun; 65(6):892-4. PubMed ID: 3011867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduction of marginal gaps in composite restorations by use of glass-ceramic inserts.
    George LA; Richards ND; Eichmiller FC
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8700783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of various types of contamination on microleakage between beta-quartz inserts and resin composite.
    Worm DA; Meiers JC
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Apr; 27(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 8941846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Olmez A; Oztaş N; Bilici S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 10200722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical comparison of three anterior restorative resins at 3 years.
    Davis RD; Mayhew RB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 May; 112(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 2940280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin.
    Sau CW; Oh GS; Koh H; Chee CS; Lim CC
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 10530277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Composites vs. microfills: indications for their use.
    Pollack BF; Blitzer MH
    N Y State Dent J; 1983 Dec; 49(10):773-5. PubMed ID: 6318169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite balls, and beta-quartz inserts on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Applequist EA; Meiers JC
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Apr; 27(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 8941843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Esthetic restoration of tooth structure using a nanofill composite system.
    Ward DH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Apr; 26(4):252, 254, 256-7. PubMed ID: 15901083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contemporary resin-based composite materials for direct placement restorations: packables, flowables and others.
    Combe EC; Burke FJ
    Dent Update; 2000 Sep; 27(7):326-32, 334-6. PubMed ID: 11218521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Watts DC; Lassila LV
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 17531311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.