These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6303791)

  • 1. The choice of a suture to close abdominal incisions.
    Bucknall TE; Teare L; Ellis H
    Eur Surg Res; 1983; 15(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 6303791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal wound closure: choice of suture.
    Bucknall TE
    J R Soc Med; 1981 Aug; 74(8):580-5. PubMed ID: 7288793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing wound complications: a clinical and experimental study.
    Bucknall TE
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Mar; 65(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 6299161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
    Bucknall TE; Ellis H
    Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 6264641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of upper abdominal wound closure with monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
    Askew AR
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1983 Aug; 53(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 6311152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tissue reaction to suture materials in infected surgical wounds--a histopathologic evaluation.
    Varma S; Johnson LW; Ferguson HL; Lumb WV
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Apr; 42(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 6277211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further studies with polyglycolic acid (Dexon) and other sutures in infected experimental wounds.
    Varma S; Lumb WV; Johnson LW; Ferguson HL
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Apr; 42(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 6277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure.
    Rodeheaver GT; Nesbit WS; Edlich RF
    Ann Surg; 1986 Aug; 204(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 3017248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infections in neurosurgery: a randomized comparison between silk and polyglycolic acid.
    Blomstedt GC
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1985; 76(3-4):90-3. PubMed ID: 2992238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An experimental study of the relationship between synergistic wound sepsis and suture materials.
    McGeehan D; Hunt D; Chaudhuri A; Rutter P
    Br J Surg; 1980 Sep; 67(9):636-8. PubMed ID: 6253005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Running closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using a synthetic monofilament absorbable looped suture.
    Iwase K; Higaki J; Tanaka Y; Kondoh H; Yoshikawa M; Kamiike W
    Surg Today; 1999; 29(9):874-9. PubMed ID: 10489128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcutaneous incorporation of nonabsorbable monofilament sutures.
    Gittes RF; Foreman R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jun; 166(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 2967554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The closure of abdominal wounds in cancer patients.
    Gallitano AL; Kondi ES
    J Surg Oncol; 1976; 8(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 136551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of seven suture materials in infected wounds--an experimental study.
    Varma S; Ferguson HL; Breen H; Lumb WV
    J Surg Res; 1974 Sep; 17(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 4278039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations.
    Corman ML; Veidenheimer MC; Coller JA
    Am J Surg; 1981 Apr; 141(4):510-13. PubMed ID: 6452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tissue colonization from implantable biomaterials with low numbers of bacteria.
    Merritt K; Hitchins VM; Neale AR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999 Mar; 44(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 10397928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behaviour of synthetic absorbable sutures with and without synergistic enteric infection.
    Kapadia CR; Mann JB; McGeehan D; Jose Biglin JE; Waxman BP; Dudley HA
    Eur Surg Res; 1983; 15(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 6303792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.
    Talpur AA; Awan MS; Surhio AR
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 24800342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histopathological aspects of tissue reactivity to suture materials in microsurgical arterial, anastomosis.
    Ussia G; Feldmann D; Galletti M; Salerno A; Jacono A; Galletti G
    Ital J Surg Sci; 1985; 15(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 2999032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.