These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 630747)
1. Mammographic screening: a reappraisal of benefits and risks. Bailar JC Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Mar; 21(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 630747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluating the benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening]. Kullmann T; Misset JL Orv Hetil; 2010 Aug; 151(35):1409-14. PubMed ID: 20719714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [To the Editors: Comment on the study by Kullmann and Misset "Benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening"]. Laszlo T Orv Hetil; 2010 Dec; 151(49):2032-3, discussion 2033-4.. PubMed ID: 21361059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer screening for women 40 to 49 years of age: what is a clinician to do? Gemignani ML Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):548-9. PubMed ID: 17766597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs. Woloshin S; Schwartz LM JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):164-5. PubMed ID: 20068211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic detection of breast cancer. Review and recommendations. Sadowsky NL; Kalisher L; White G; Ferrucci JT N Engl J Med; 1976 Feb; 294(7):370-3. PubMed ID: 1246289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse effects of screening mammography. Feig SA Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):807-19, v. PubMed ID: 15337417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiogenic breast cancer effects of mammographic screening. Gohagan JK; Darby WP; Spitznagel EL; Monsees BS; Tome AE J Natl Cancer Inst; 1986 Jul; 77(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 3459927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [To the Editors: Comment on the study by Kullmann and Misset "Benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening"]. Kovács A; Budai A; Döbrössy L; Péntek Z; Ormándi K; Forrai G Orv Hetil; 2010 Dec; 151(49):2031-2, discussion 2033-4.. PubMed ID: 21106484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening for breast cancer: a view from 2 worlds. Murphy AM JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 20068212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic screening for breast cancer by lateral view only: is it practical? Moskowitz M; Libshitz HI J Can Assoc Radiol; 1977 Dec; 28(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 925066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Section editor's notebook: breast cancer screening and overdiagnosis unmasked. Javitt MC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):259-61. PubMed ID: 24450663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Gambler's Fallacy in Screening Mammography. Callen AL; Lobach I; Mesina O; Marcus S; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Greenwood HI J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jun; 16(6):830-833. PubMed ID: 30611683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Organised mammographic screening--more benefits than harms. Hofvind S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Mar; 133(6):619-20. PubMed ID: 23552154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography Screening Still Brings Mixed Advice. Jenks S J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Aug; 107(8):. PubMed ID: 26243200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening. DeAngelis CD; Fontanarosa PB JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):172-3. PubMed ID: 20068215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of the difference between the results of complex mammography and histology-- a contribution to the sensitivity and specificity of mammography]. Kettritz U; Preuss HJ Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Jan; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 1547290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]