These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6311502)

  • 1. Third-generation and investigational cephalosporins: II. Microbiologic review and clinical summaries.
    Garzone P; Lyon J; Yu VL
    Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1983 Sep; 17(9):615-22. PubMed ID: 6311502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative in vitro activity of first, second and third generation cephalosporins.
    Forsgren A
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B; 1981 Aug; 89(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 6274143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative activities of the oxa-beta-lactam LY127935, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, cefamandole, and ticarcillin against multiply resistant gram-negative bacilli.
    Hall WH; Opfer BJ; Gerding DN
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Feb; 17(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 6247970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of in vitro activity of third-generation cephalosporins and other newer beta-lactam antibiotics against clinically important bacteria.
    Thornsberry C
    Am J Med; 1985 Aug; 79(2A):14-20. PubMed ID: 3927723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and moxalactam against 150 Gram negative strains (author's transl)].
    Nasnas R; Gutmann L; Kitzis MD; Goldstein F; Acar JF
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1982 Jun; 30(6):341-4. PubMed ID: 6287385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ceftriaxone: in vitro activity against 410 bacterial isolates compared with cefotaxime.
    Digranes A; Benonisen E; Dibb WL
    Infection; 1982; 10(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 6293978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Third-generation cephalosporins: a critical evaluation.
    Barriere SL; Flaherty JF
    Clin Pharm; 1984; 3(4):351-73. PubMed ID: 6432420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [In vitro antibacterial activity of eight third generation cephalosporins (author's transl)].
    Deforges L; Le Van Thoi J; Soussy CJ; Duval J
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1982 Jun; 30(6):363-9. PubMed ID: 6810282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of the in vitro activity of cefoperazone: a comparison with other beta-lactam antibiotics.
    Wise R; Gillett AP; Andrews JM
    Clin Ther; 1980; 3(Spec Issue):149-55. PubMed ID: 6446391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibacterial activity of the cephamycin cefotetan: an in-vitro comparison with other beta-lactam antibiotics.
    Clarke AM; Zemcov SJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1983 Jan; 11 Suppl():67-72. PubMed ID: 6404881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of cephalosporins in the treatment of bacterial meningitis in adults. Overview with special emphasis on ceftazidime.
    Norrby SR
    Am J Med; 1985 Aug; 79(2A):56-61. PubMed ID: 3895919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in-vitro comparison of new cephalosporins with special reference to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    van Klingeren B
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1981 Sep; 8 Suppl B():97-105. PubMed ID: 19810171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamics of resistance to cephalosporins.
    Atkinson BA
    Chemioterapia; 1985 Feb; 4(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 3986942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of in vitro activity of GR 20263, a novel cephalosporin derivative, with activities of other beta-lactam compounds.
    Wise R; Andrews JM; Bedford KA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 May; 17(5):884-9. PubMed ID: 6772097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The in vitro activity of moxalactam against 430 clinical, bacterial isolates.
    Digranes A; Benonisen E; Dibb WL; Ostervold B
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1982 Feb; 90(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 6211028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences between cephalothin and newer parenterally absorbed cephalosporins in vitro: a justification for separate disks.
    Washington JA II
    J Infect Dis; 1978 May; 137 Suppl():S32-S37. PubMed ID: 349096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [In vitro antibacterial activity of cefodizime (HR 221) on 323 hospital strains of Gram negative bacilli. Comparison with cefotiam, cefoperazone, cefotetan and cefotaxime].
    Le Noc P; Bryskier A; Le Noc D
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 May; 33(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 3897972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Third-generation cephalosporins: comparative antibacterial activity against routine clinical isolates.
    Corser CA; Day GJ; Humble MW
    N Z Med J; 1982 Jun; 95(710):414-6. PubMed ID: 6810246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative in vitro studies of Ro 13-9904, a new cephalosporin derivative.
    Eickhoff TC; Ehret J
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Mar; 19(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 6264845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the in vitro activity of Bay k 4999 and piperacillin, two new antipseudomonal broad-spectrum penicillins, with other beta-lactam drugs.
    Wise R; Andrews JM; Bedford KA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Oct; 14(4):549-52. PubMed ID: 102245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.