580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6316414)
1. New diphosphonate compounds for skeletal imaging: comparison with methylene diphosphonate.
Subramanian G; McAfee JG; Thomas FD; Feld TA; Zapf-Longo C; Palladino E
Radiology; 1983 Dec; 149(3):823-8. PubMed ID: 6316414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tc-99m HMDP (hydroxymethylene diphosphonate): a radiopharmaceutical for skeletal and acute myocardial infarct imaging. I. Synthesis and distribution in animals.
Bevan JA; Tofe AJ; Benedict JJ; Francis MD; Barnett BL
J Nucl Med; 1980 Oct; 21(10):961-6. PubMed ID: 6252298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tc-99m HMDP (hydroxymethylene diphosphonate): a radiopharmaceutical for skeletal and acute myocardial infarct imaging. II. Comparison of Tc-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (HMDP) with other technetium-labeled bone-imaging agents in a canine model.
Bevan JA; Tofe AJ; Benedict JJ; Francis MD; Barnett BL
J Nucl Med; 1980 Oct; 21(10):967-70. PubMed ID: 6252299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of bone imaging with Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication.
Buell U; Kleinhans E; Zorn-Bopp E; Reuschel W; Muenzing W; Moser EA; Seiderer M
J Nucl Med; 1982 Mar; 23(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 6460854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical comparison of MDP and DMAD.
Rosenthall L; Stern J; Arzoumanian A
Clin Nucl Med; 1982 Sep; 7(9):403-6. PubMed ID: 6214358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technetium-99m MDP vs technetium-99m dicarboxypropane diphosphonate. A clinical comparison in various pathologic conditions.
Godart G; Durez M; Bevilacqua M; Abramovici J; Robience Y
Clin Nucl Med; 1986 Feb; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 3769350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biokinetics of bone tracers by means of deconvolution analysis--comparison of 99mTc MDP, 99mTc DPD and 99mTc EHDP.
Knop J; Stritzke P; Kröger E; Schneider C; Wasmus G
Nuklearmedizin; 1982 Aug; 21(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 6216459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of skeletal uptakes of three diphosphonates by whole-body retention: concise communication.
Fogelman I; Pearson DW; Bessent RG; Tofe AJ; Francis MD
J Nucl Med; 1981 Oct; 22(10):880-3. PubMed ID: 6457135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technetium-99m complexes of dimethylaminomethylene diphosphonate (DMAD)--II. Biological distributions of 99mTc-DMAD components isolated by anion exchange HPLC.
Holland ME; Bugaj J; Heineman WR; Deutsch E
Int J Rad Appl Instrum B; 1989; 16(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 2497091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 99Tcm-labelled MDP and DMAD bone scanning agents in patients with advanced breast cancer.
Coleman RE; Meier CA; Rubens RD; Fogelman I
Nucl Med Commun; 1988 Jul; 9(7):481-5. PubMed ID: 3173907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate--a superior agent for skeletal imaging: comparison with other technetium complexes.
Subramanian G; McAfee JG; Blair RJ; Kallfelz FA; Thomas FD
J Nucl Med; 1975 Aug; 16(8):744-55. PubMed ID: 170385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical studies on bone deposition of 99mTc-labeled-DPD (dicarboxypropane diphosphonate): a comparison with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate].
Otsuka N; Yoneda M; Sawai M; Saito J; Nagai K; Muranaka A; Terashima H; Yanagimoto S; Ito Y
Kaku Igaku; 1982 Dec; 19(10):1573-8. PubMed ID: 6221135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer analysis of Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP kinetics in humans: concise communication.
Mele M; Conte E; Fratello A; Pasculli D; Pieralice M; D'Addabbo A
J Nucl Med; 1983 Apr; 24(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 6834136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which diphosphonate for routine bone scintigraphy (MDP, HDP or DPD)?
Frühling J; Verbist A; Balikdjian D
Nucl Med Commun; 1986 Jun; 7(6):415-25. PubMed ID: 3748485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Localization of 99mTc-diphosphonates in newly formed bone matrix as a measure of bone lesion detectability.
Schuemichen C; Krause T; Umbach G; Wolff T
Nuklearmedizin; 1988 Feb; 27(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 3368337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 99Tcm-MDP and 99Tcm-DPD in pathologic bone lesions. A visual and quantitative comparison.
Lantto T; Vorne M; Mokka R; Vähätalo S
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):631-3. PubMed ID: 2960361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of three diphosphonates: in vitro adsorption (C- 14 labeled) and in vivo osteogenic uptake (Tc-99m complexed).
Francis MD; Ferguson DL; Tofe AJ; Bevan JA; Michaels SE
J Nucl Med; 1980 Dec; 21(12):1185-9. PubMed ID: 6449567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 99mTc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate: a new bone imaging agent with a low tin content.
Domstad PA; Coupal JJ; Kim EE; Blake JS; DeLand FH
Radiology; 1980 Jul; 136(1):209-11. PubMed ID: 6446106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of tc-99m MDP, HMDP, and DPD with respect to bone-to-soft tissue ratios.
Buell U; Kirsch CM; Kleinhans E; Jäger B
J Nucl Med; 1983 Dec; 24(12):1201-2. PubMed ID: 6227711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Technetium-99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate and hydroxyethylidine diphosphonate--biologic and clinical comparison: concise communication.
Rudd TG; Allen DR; Smith FD
J Nucl Med; 1979 Aug; 20(8):821-6. PubMed ID: 120422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
