BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6316714)

  • 1. Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests.
    Häusler R; Colburn S; Marr E
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1983; 400():1-62. PubMed ID: 6316714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of monaural and binaural cues to sound localization in listeners with acquired unilateral conductive hearing loss: improved directional hearing with a bone-conduction device.
    Agterberg MJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Van Wanrooij MM; Van Opstal AJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 286(1-2):9-18. PubMed ID: 22616091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices.
    Denanto FM; Wales J; Tideholm B; Asp F
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1708-1720. PubMed ID: 35588503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment.
    Noble W; Byrne D; Lepage B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):992-1005. PubMed ID: 8132913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Horizontal sound localisation accuracy in individuals with conductive hearing loss: effect of the bone conduction implant.
    Asp F; Reinfeldt S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):657-664. PubMed ID: 29764239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural interaction and localization with various hearing impairments.
    Colburn HS
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():27-45. PubMed ID: 6955927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Localization and Spatial Discrimination in Children and Adolescents with Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss Tested without Their Hearing Aids.
    Meuret S; Ludwig AA; Predel D; Staske B; Fuchs M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(6):326-342. PubMed ID: 29495018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bilateral bone conduction stimulation provides reliable binaural cues for localization.
    Snapp H; Vogt K; Agterberg MJH
    Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 388():107881. PubMed ID: 31945691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane.
    Pedley AJ; Kitterick PT
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():104-111. PubMed ID: 28666702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Merits of Bilateral Application of Bone-Conduction Devices in Children With Bilateral Conductive Hearing Loss.
    den Besten CA; Vogt K; Bosman AJ; Snik AFM; Hol MKS; Agterberg MJH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1327-1332. PubMed ID: 32032221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Sound lateralization regarding amplitude and time factors in various forms of hearing loss].
    Belov IM; Mal'tseva NV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1989; (2):24-8. PubMed ID: 2728174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound lateralization and interaural discrimination. Effects of brainstem infarcts and multiple sclerosis lesions.
    Furst M; Aharonson V; Levine RA; Fullerton BC; Tadmor R; Pratt H; Polyakov A; Korczyn AD
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 10771182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on interaural discrimination and virtual localization.
    Smith-Olinde L; Koehnke J; Besing J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2084-99. PubMed ID: 9566330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial hearing ability of the pigmented Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus): Minimum audible angle and spatial release from masking in azimuth.
    Greene NT; Anbuhl KL; Ferber AT; DeGuzman M; Allen PD; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():62-76. PubMed ID: 29778290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consequences of conductive auditory impairment for binaural hearing.
    Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):466-72. PubMed ID: 3745678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors.
    Senn P; Kompis M; Vischer M; Haeusler R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(6):342-52. PubMed ID: 16103645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.