These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. "Viability" revisits the Court in Colautti v. Franklin. Horan DV Hosp Prog; 1979 Feb; 60(2):18-21, 24. PubMed ID: 759352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium. Chopko ME Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached. Slandell H Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes. Bartleman A West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose. Swyers MH Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The future of abortion. McDaniel A Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions. Satris MJ Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions. Granfield D Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis. Linton PB Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster. Bannon AE; Nigro SA State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence. Flanagan PP Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Illinois Court requires physician to try to save viable fetus. Horan DJ Hosp Prog; 1978 Jun; 59(6):6, 12. PubMed ID: 649132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How technology is reframing the abortion debate. Callahan D Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal abortions in the United States since the 1973 Supreme Court decisions. Weinstock E; Tietze C; Jaffe FS; Dryfoos JG Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 1112381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Judicial decision making and biological fact: Roe v. Wade and the unresolved question of fetal viability. Blank RH West Polit Q; 1984 Dec; 37(4):584-602. PubMed ID: 11655744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]