These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 631828)

  • 1. Board refuses CON for cardiac surgery facility.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1978 Apr; 59(4):82, 84, 87. PubMed ID: 631828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CON unnecessary when hospital resumes service.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1981 Jan; 62(1):68. PubMed ID: 10317041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virginia Supreme Court requires CON for a hospital open heart surgery unit reactivated after one year.
    Kinney ED
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 May; 7(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10317458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Court won't rule on CON inequity.
    Horty JF
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Oct; 9(10):90, 94. PubMed ID: 481414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court enjoins completion of a hospital parking lot because affiliated holding company failed to obtain a CON.
    Kinney ED
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(22):18-9. PubMed ID: 10263295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CON: an added burden for smaller hospitals.
    Meeker RA
    Mich Hosp; 1987 Sep; 23(9):27-8, 30. PubMed ID: 10283547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hospital appealed CON denial.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1978 Nov; 59(11):82. PubMed ID: 700686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should certificate of need legislation be repealed?
    Maressa VA
    J Med Soc N J; 1984 Mar; 81(3):185. PubMed ID: 6585562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital awarded CON for shelled space.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1979 Apr; 60(4):84. PubMed ID: 422174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of certificate of need: an administrator's role.
    Trent GE
    Case Stud Health Adm; 1978; 1():18-22. PubMed ID: 10287541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Michigan's new CON reform package: major changes and implementation methods.
    Wheeler W
    Mich Hosp; 1989 Feb; 25(2):12-5. PubMed ID: 10291912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public opinion influences decision on CON process.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1982 Jul; 63(7):95, 97. PubMed ID: 10255979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oral Roberts' City of Faith gives planning law a crucial test.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Oct; 11(6):28-31. PubMed ID: 10238719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arkansas court halts construction, upholds state health plan in CON proceeding.
    Nestrud CR
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jan; 7(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 10264696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doing more than filing and suing to get CON approval.
    Robischon T
    Appl Radiol; 1981; 10(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 10255055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strong osteopathic identity yields some legal clout.
    Richard MH; MacCallum JM
    OH; 1984 Jan; 28(1):8-10, 20. PubMed ID: 10264421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A case for preserving CON.
    Parker JA
    GHA Today; 2005; 49(4):13. PubMed ID: 16220682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CON implications: a look into the crystal ball.
    Ward R
    Mich Hosp; 1989 Feb; 25(2):7-8, 11. PubMed ID: 10291918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital topical law: "A certificate of need".
    Morse HN
    Hosp Top; 1982; 60(1):2, 18, 28 passim. PubMed ID: 10254145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Creating new facilities, services no longer requires THFC approval.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1986 Mar; 41(10):18-9. PubMed ID: 10276544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.