These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 632137)

  • 1. [Nose and speech discrimination with specific hearing aid systems (author's transl)].
    Bernath O; Richartz W; Bormann B
    HNO; 1978 Feb; 26(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 632137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Directional hearing and understanding of speech in noise uith "normal hearing" people (author's transl)].
    Platte HJ; Döring WH; Schlöndorff G
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jul; 57(7):672-80. PubMed ID: 682785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Discrimination and critical signal to noise ratio of normal and pathological hearing (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Feb; 56(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 139521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Speech discrimination in prescence of noise in different kinds of hearing loss (author's transl)].
    Hahn R
    Audiology; 1974; 13(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 4410930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech discrimination and effectiveness of hearing aids under listening conditions similar to those of a transit operator.
    Lee LA; Chung DY; Gannon RP
    J Otolaryngol; 1981 Jun; 10(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 7277564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Speech discrimination and dynamic compression. A comparative study with hearing aids (author's transl)].
    Welleschik B; Wicke W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Jul; 56(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 142877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Audiology; 1986; 25(4-5):210-26. PubMed ID: 3566630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.
    Pascoe DP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(5 pt 2 Suppl 23):1-40. PubMed ID: 1180471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Fastl H
    HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of fitting formulas in programmable hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise.
    Dündar SE; Aksoy S
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2007; 17(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 18187987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The value of brain-stem audiometry in the selection of hearing aids].
    Kiessling J
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Feb; 63(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 6700342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal circuit noise of hearing aids and speech intelligibility.
    Sung RJ; Sung GS; Angelelli RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):239-42. PubMed ID: 931758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.