146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6322145)
1. Rho(D) immune globulin. When to use it in the Rho(D)-negative woman.
Lavery JP
Postgrad Med; 1984 Mar; 75(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 6322145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prenatal and perinatal immunohematology: recommendations for serologic management of the fetus, newborn infant, and obstetric patient.
Judd WJ; Luban NL; Ness PM; Silberstein LE; Stroup M; Widmann FK
Transfusion; 1990 Feb; 30(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 2154871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative analysis of the effects to date of the prevention of Rh incompatibility].
Jedwabny A; Suchocki S; Bobrowska G
Acta Haematol Pol; 1988; 19(1-2):56-8. PubMed ID: 2853507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Current viewpoints in the anti-D prevention of rhesus alloimmunization in the pregnant woman and of hemolytic disease of the newborn infant (a review of the literature)].
Spasova K; Vŭlcheva B
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1986; 25(3):84-90. PubMed ID: 3019168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rh(D) haemolytic disease of the newborn: the changing scene.
Urbaniak SJ
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6487):4-6. PubMed ID: 2990630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Controversies in Rh prophylaxis. Who needs Rh immune globulin and when should it be given?
Bowman JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 151(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 2982267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ACOG releases report on prevention of D isoimmunization.
Am Fam Physician; 1991 Jan; 43(1):307-8, 310. PubMed ID: 1846056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Antepartum Rh immune globulin.
Wible-Kant J; Beer AE
Clin Perinatol; 1983 Jun; 10(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 6311476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mechanism of action of anti-D-gamma globulin in preventing rhesus alloimmunization in the pregnant woman and hemolytic disease of the newborn infant].
Vŭlcheva B; Spasova K
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1985; 24(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 2990248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of Rh immune globulin: a review.
Sutton GP; Jay A; Lim YS; Noland JE; Boral LI
Indiana Med; 1988 Apr; 81(4):321-2. PubMed ID: 2834434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [New recommendations for the completion of rhesus-immunization prophylaxis with anti-D].
Maas DH; Schneider J
Immun Infekt; 1982 Nov; 10(6):244-9. PubMed ID: 6307863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Haemolytic disease of the newborn.
Whitfield CR; Lee D
BMJ; 1990 Mar; 300(6727):814. PubMed ID: 2157515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rh immune globulin after genetic amniocentesis: impact on pregnancy outcome.
Crane JP; Rohland B; Larson D
Am J Med Genet; 1984 Dec; 19(4):763-8. PubMed ID: 6097129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Is it advisable to produce anti-Rh0(D) immunoglobulin for the prevention of hemolytic disease of the newborn? (apropos the article by A. A. Mikhaĭlova and N. Ia. Klimova)].
Olovnikova NI; Chertkov IL
Gematol Transfuziol; 1993 Mar; 38(3):38-40. PubMed ID: 8020736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Efforts should be made to eradicate Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.
Caiola G
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1984 Jan; 39(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 6320075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ABC of transfusion. Haemolytic disease of the newborn and its prevention.
Tovey LA
BMJ; 1990 Feb; 300(6720):313-6. PubMed ID: 2155679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the Center for Rh-negative Mothers. Hospital Paula Jaraquemada (3 years)].
Krug A; Bianchi R; Pérez N; Ilabaca G; Farías S; Rojas E
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1981; 46(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 6099901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The course of pregnancy and labor following legal abortion].
Kirchhoff H
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1974 Dec; 178(6):407-14. PubMed ID: 4617442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Status of rhesus prevention in the year 1982].
Schneider J
Arch Gynecol; 1983; 235(1-4):411-8. PubMed ID: 6314914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventing rhesus isoimmunization. Antepartum Rh immune globulin prophylaxis versus a sensitive test for risk identification.
Hensleigh PA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 146(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 6307052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
