These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 632417)

  • 1. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of segmental features of speech.
    Sparks DW; Kuhl PK; Edmonds AE; Gray GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jan; 63(1):246-57. PubMed ID: 632417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of connected discourse.
    Sparks DW; Ardell LA; Bourgeois M; Wiedmer B; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 65(3):810-5. PubMed ID: 447911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonemic information transmitted by a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):620-9. PubMed ID: 3230892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception studies using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, residual hearing, and lipreading.
    Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2593-607. PubMed ID: 2526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.
    Rabinowitz WM; Eddington DK; Delhorne LA; Cuneo PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1869-81. PubMed ID: 1401531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual and tactual perception of syllable number in sentence stimuli.
    Bourgeois MS; Goldstein H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):367-71. PubMed ID: 6219145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory projects in tactile aids to lipreading.
    De Filippo CL
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):211-27. PubMed ID: 6468779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tactual display of consonant voicing as a supplement to lipreading.
    Yuan H; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1003-15. PubMed ID: 16158656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tactual speech perception by minimally trained deaf subjects.
    Oller DK; Payne SL; Gavin WJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):769-78. PubMed ID: 6449633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. INDSCAL analysis of perceptual judgments for 24 consonants via visual, tactile, and visual-tactile inputs.
    Danhauer JL; Appel MA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Mar; 19(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 1271803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory implants and tactile aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Pickett JM; McFarland W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):134-50. PubMed ID: 3884896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tactile perception by the profoundly deaf. Speech and environmental sounds.
    Plant GL
    Br J Audiol; 1982 Nov; 16(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 6897619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech feature recognition by profoundly hearing impaired children using a multiple-channel electrotactile speech processor and aided residual hearing.
    Alcántara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1260-73. PubMed ID: 2146295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a principal-components tactile aid for the hearing-impaired.
    Weisenberger JM; Craig JC; Abbott GD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1944-57. PubMed ID: 1960288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of handedness in tactile speech perception.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(4):423-35. PubMed ID: 8158558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.